ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Explaining Positional Differences of Performance Profiles for the Elite Female Basketball Players.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- External and Internal Load Variables Encountered During Training and Games in Female Basketball Players According to Playing Level and Playing Position: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine - open · 2022Pooled it
- Technical-tactical performance of Spanish female basketball players in first division (2013-2022): effects of match outcome, location, and playing position.Biology of sport · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Differentiating Attacking and Defensive Performance for Various Playing Positions during the Tokyo Olympics Men's Basketball Competition.Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
- Stiffness characteristics of the lower extremities in Women's Chinese Basketball Association competition athletes: normative values and position differences.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Positional contrasts in key techniques between men's and women's basketball at the Olympic level.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Redefining player roles in professional women's basketball: From traditional positions to functional profiles.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to explore the differences in technical performances of players considering playing positions by controlling the effect of situational variables in each FIBA female continental basketball competition. Samples of 9,208 observations from 471 games in the America, Africa, Asia, and Europe Championships during 2013-2017 were collected and analyzed by generalized mixed linear modeling. The results showed that Centers from Europe had more 2-point made (ES = 0.69), 2-point attempted (ES = 0.79), and offensive (ES = 0.64) and defensive (ES = 0.48) rebounds than forward. Asian and European guards performed a fewer number of 2-point made (ES = 0.90; 0.91), 2-point attempted (ES = 1.06; 0.98), and offensive (ES = 1.30; 1.23) and defensive (ES = 0.93; 0.94) rebounds than Asian and European centers. African and Asian forward had more 2-point made (ES = 0.48; 0.50), 2-point attempted (ES = 0.50; 0.56) than guards. This study helps to better understand the technical demands of female basketball among different international competitions, which could pave a new way to analyze the development trend of female basketball and promoting specific training plans and game strategies for coaches and players.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.