Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33584109›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2021

Yisheng Zhao, Cleber Galvão, Wanzhi Cai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chagas disease in Trinidad and Tobago - a call to action.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First report ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Insects · 2023
    Article
  13. High Parasitic Loads Quantified in SylvaticPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Insects · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. First report of Rhodnius montenegrensis (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) in Bolivia.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yisheng ZhaoDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China China Agricultural University Beijing China.
Cleber GalvãoLaboratório Nacional e Internacional de Referência em Taxonomia de Triatomíneos, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, LNIRTT/IOC/FIOCRUZ, Pavilhão Rocha Lima, 5° andar, Avenida Brasil, 4365, Manguinhos, RJ, Brazil Instituto Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-9205
Wanzhi CaiDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China China Agricultural University Beijing China.
China Agricultural University · CNFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Comparative terminologygenitaliageometric morphologykissing bugtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID33584109
PMCPMC7854562
OpenAlexW3125123142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.