ArticleAfrican journal of biomedical research : AJBR2020
Protocol and Researcher's Relationship with Institutional Review Board.
Article in African journal of biomedical research : AJBR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The document of ethical approval is an important official requirement for research involving human participants worldwide. It is the process whereby an investigator submits the full research proposal and related documents including detailed informed consent process to an independent Institutional Review Board (IRB) for scrutiny. The process of seeking review and approval is necessary to ensure adequate measure are in place to safeguard and protect research participants as entrenched in the principles of The Declaration of Helsinki and The Belmont Report. It is the responsibility of every clinical researcher to obtain ethical approval, therefore, their obligation to understand the process of review and establish relationship with local IRB in order to enhance smooth review and approval. This article, therefore, explains clinical research and distinguishes between research and clinical care, clarifies briefly what constitutes a study protocol and describes the researchers' relationship with IRB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33584094PMC7876614What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.