Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33583686›Full record

ArticlePancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]2021

Validation of the ENDPAC model: Identifying new-onset diabetics at risk of pancreatic cancer.

Salman Khan, Rudi Fnu Safarudin, Justin T Kupec

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04662879 (A Prospective Study of Algorithm-based Screening in Patients With Glycemically Defined New Onset Diabetes to Evaluate Risk for and Earlier Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma; Early Detection Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04662879 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Prospective Study of Algorithm-based Screening in Patients With Glycemically Defined New Onset Diabetes to Evaluate Risk for and Earlier Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma; Early Detection Initiative (EDI) for Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPancreatic Cancer Action NetworkRan2021 to 2028Enrolled8,869ConditionsHyperglycemia, Diabetes Mellitus, Pancreas Ductal AdenocarcinomaArmsEnriching New-onset Diabetes for Pancreatic Cancer (ENDPAC) score, Abdominal imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Decision support tools for pancreatic cancer detection: external validation in Australian primary care - a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Salman KhanDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, USA. Electronic address: salman.khan@hsc.wvu.edu.
Rudi Fnu SafarudinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, USA; School of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tadulako University, Indonesia.
Justin T KupecSection of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with new-onset diabetes are known to be at a higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer. The Enriching New-Onset Diabetes for Pancreatic Cancer (ENDPAC) model was recently developed to identify new-onset diabetics with this higher risk. Further validation is needed before the ENDPAC model is implemented as part of a screening program to identify pancreatic cancer.

methodsA retrospective case-control study was performed; a cohort of patients with new-onset diabetes was identified using hemoglobin A1c. Patients were scored by the ENDPAC model and then divided based on whether pancreatic cancer was diagnosed after the diagnosis of diabetes. The performance of the model was assessed globally and at different cutoffs.

resultsThere were 6254 controls and 48 cases of pancreatic cancer. Bivariate analysis showed that patients with pancreatic cancer lost weight before diagnosis while controls gained weight (-0.93 kg/m2 vs. 0.45 kg/m2, p < 0.00∗). Cases had a more significant increase in their HbA1C from one year before (1.3% vs. 0.82%, p = 0.02). Smoking and pancreatitis rates were higher in cases compared to controls (p < 0.00∗). The area under the curve (AUC) of the ENDPAC model was 0.72. A score >1 was the optimal cutoff. At this cutoff, the sensitivity was 56%, specificity was 75%, and pancreatic cancer prevalence increased from 0.78% at baseline to 1.7%.

conclusionThe ENDPAC model was validated in an independent cohort of patients with new-onset diabetes.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision RulesModels, BiologicalAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesDiabetes MellitusDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsDiabetesENDPACPancreatic cancerScreeningWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID33583686
PMCPMC8393564
OpenAlexW3128187757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.