Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33583434›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

Subcellular view of host-microbiome nutrient exchange in sponges: insights into the ecological success of an early metazoan-microbe symbiosis.

Meggie Hudspith, Laura Rix, Michelle Achlatis, Jeremy Bougoure, Paul Guagliardo, Peta L Clode, Nicole S Webster, Gerard Muyzer, Mathieu Pernice, Jasper M de Goeij

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Taking a microscale look at symbiotic interactions-and why it matters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Meggie HudspithDepartment of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.r.hudspith@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6069-8338
Laura RixSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1888-6597
Michelle AchlatisSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6390-7177
Jeremy BougoureCentre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4869-035X
Paul GuagliardoCentre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3488-6754
Peta L ClodeCentre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5188-4737
Nicole S WebsterAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4753-5278
Gerard MuyzerDepartment of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2422-0732
Mathieu PerniceClimate Change Cluster (C3), Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3431-2104
Jasper M de GoeijDepartment of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3411-3084
The University of Western Australia · AUThe University of Queensland · AUAustralian Institute of Marine Science · AUCaribbean Research and Management of Biodiversity Foundation · CWInstitute for Biodiversity · DEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSponges are increasingly recognised as key ecosystem engineers in many aquatic habitats. They play an important role in nutrient cycling due to their unrivalled capacity for processing both dissolved and particulate organic matter (DOM and POM) and the exceptional metabolic repertoire of their diverse and abundant microbial communities. Functional studies determining the role of host and microbiome in organic nutrient uptake and exchange, however, are limited. Therefore, we coupled pulse-chase isotopic tracer techniques with nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS) to visualise the uptake and translocation of

resultsThe two sponge species showed significant enrichment of DOM- and POM-derived

conclusionsHere, we provide empirical evidence indicating that the prokaryotic communities of a high and a low microbial abundance sponge obtain nutritional benefits from their host-associated lifestyle. The metabolic interaction between the highly efficient filter-feeding host and its microbial symbionts likely provides a competitive advantage to the sponge holobiont in the oligotrophic environments in which they thrive, by retaining and recycling limiting nutrients. Sponges present a unique model to link nutritional symbiotic interactions to holobiont function, and, via cascading effects, ecosystem functioning, in one of the earliest metazoan-microbe symbioses. Video abstract.

Indexed as

SymbiosisAnimalsCarbonMicrobiotaNitrogenNutrientsPoriferaCarbonNitrogenNutrientsAnimal–microbe symbiosisDissolved organic matter (DOM)HMA–LMANanoSIMSNutrient translocationParticulate organic matter (POM)

Identifiers

PMID33583434
PMCPMC7883440
OpenAlexW3132412957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.