ArticleBMC family practice2021
Family medicine practitioners' stress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Pooled it
- Self-Reported Outdoor Activities and Perceived Stress During the First COVID-19 Wave: A Cross-Sectional Study in Poland and Italy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- The relationship between psychological stress and SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid-antibody response following natural infection: longitudinal findings from the Aegis study.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Work-related stress and its associated factors among primary care doctors in Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Strengthening workforce resilience to sustain community health services during crises: evidence from Chinese general practitioners.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Insights into general practitioners' self-care across 38 countries during the pandemic: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Workplace Factors Contributing to Professional Stress in Family Medicine.Acta medica academica · 2024Article
- Well-being of family physicians during COVID-19 pandemic in Slovenia.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Work & life stress experienced by professional workers during the pandemic: a gender-based analysis.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- A pre-post study of stressors and burnout affecting breast radiologists before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of radiology open · 2023Article
- German general practitioners' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and how it affected their patient care: A qualitative study.The European journal of general practice · 2023Article
- Experience and views of primary care physicians involved in reorganisation of care in family medicine practices during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study from Slovenia.The European journal of general practice · 2023Article
- Barriers and Enablers Experienced by General Practitioners in Delivering Safe and Equitable Care during COVID-19: A Qualitative Investigation in Two Countries.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The role of primary care during the pandemic: shared experiences from providers in five European countries.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- General practitioner well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- COVID-19 Continues to Burden General Practitioners: Impact on Workload, Provision of Care, and Intention to Leave.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Stress experiences of healthcare assistants in family practice at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- General practitioner care in nursing homes during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a retrospective survey among nursing home managers.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Multinational primary health care experiences from the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has shaken the world in early 2020. In France, General Practitioners (GPs) were not involved in the care organization's decision-making process before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This omission could have generated stress for GPs. We aimed first to estimate the self-perception of stress as defined by the 10-item Perceived Stress Score (PSS-10), at the beginning of the pandemic in France, among GPs from the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, a french administrative area severely impacted by COVID-19. Second, we aimed to identify factors associated with a self-perceived stress (PSS-10 ≥ 27) among socio-demographic characteristics of GPs, their access to reliable information and to personal protective equipment during the pandemic, and their exposure to well established psychosocial risk at work.
methodsWe conducted an online cross-sectional survey between 8th April and 10th May 2020. The self-perception of stress was evaluated using the PSS-10, so to see the proportion of "not stressed" (≤20), "borderline" (21 ≤ PSS-10 ≤ 26), and "stressed" (≥27) GPs. The agreement to 31 positive assertions related to possible sources of stress identified by the scientific study committee was measured using a 10-point numeric scale. In complete cases, factors associated with stress (PSS-10 ≥ 27) were investigated using logistic regression, adjusted on gender, age and practice location. A supplementary analysis of the verbatims was made.
resultsOverall, 898 individual answers were collected, of which 879 were complete. A total of 437 GPs (49%) were stressed (PSS-10 ≥ 27), and 283 GPs (32%) had a very high level of stress (PSS-10 ≥ 30). Self-perceived stress was associated with multiple components, and involved classic psychosocial risk factors such as emotional requirements. However, in this context of health crisis, the primary source of stress was the diversity and quantity of information from diverse sources (614 GPs (69%, OR = 2.21, 95%CI [1.40-3.50], p < 0.001). Analysis of verbatims revealed that GPs felt isolated in a hospital-based model.
conclusionThe first wave of the pandemic was a source of stress for GPs. The diversity and quantity of information received from the health authorities were among the main sources of stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.