Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33583254›Full record

ArticlePerception2021

The Language of Vision.

Patrick Cavanagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perception, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cognitive maps as a medium for thought.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sensitivity to Geometric Shape Regularity Emerges Independently of Vision.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  7. Episodic recombination and the role of time in mental travel.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Using compositionality to understand parts in whole objects.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrick CavanaghYork University, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3164-2340

Funding

PROCESSING STREAMS IN EARLY VISIONR01EY009258 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI CAVANAGH, PATRICK · 1991 to 2011
$3.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The descriptions of surfaces, objects, and events computed by visual processes are not solely for consumption in the visual system but are meant to be passed on to other brain centers. Clearly, the description of the visual scene cannot be sent in its entirety, like a picture or movie, to other centers, as that would require that each of them have their own visual system to decode the description. Some very compressed, annotated, or labeled version must be constructed that can be passed on in a format that other centers-memory, language, planning-can understand. If this is a "visual language," what is its grammar? In a first pass, we see, among other things, differences in processing of visual "nouns," visual "verbs," and visual "prepositions." Then we look at recursion and errors of visual grammar. Finally, the possibility of a visual language also raises the question of the acquisition of its grammar from the visual environment and the chance that this acquisition process was borrowed and adapted for spoken language.

Indexed as

BrainLanguageAdaptation, PhysiologicalHumansattentionlanguagePerceptionshapes/objectsspatial cognition

Identifiers

PMID33583254
PMCPMC7961739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.