Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33583203›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2021

The Potential of Personalized Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Feasibility Trial.

Letizia Perna MSc Msw, Sam Lund, Nicola White, Ollie Minton

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07567391 (Virtual Reality Nature Therapy for Palliative Patients and Caregivers in Saudi Arabia), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07567391 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Reality Nature Therapy for Palliative Patients and Caregivers in Saudi Arabia: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Quality of Life and Cultural Adaptation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BishaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsVirtual Reality, Quality of Life, Palliative Care, CaregiversArmsImmersive Nature VR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Letizia Perna MSc Msw9098Royal Trinity Hospice, London, UK.
Sam Lund9098Royal Trinity Hospice, London, UK.
Nicola WhiteMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, 4919UCL, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7438-0072
Ollie Minton4968St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4258-8995

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual Reality can help alleviate symptoms in a non-palliative care population. Personalized therapy can further alleviate these symptoms. There is little evidence in a palliative care population.

aimTo understand the feasibility of repeated personalized virtual reality sessions in a palliative care population.

designA feasibility randomized control trial. Intervention: personalized virtual reality, Control: non-personalized virtual reality. All participants completed a 4-minute virtual reality session for 4 weeks. At each point, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (scored 0 = none up to 100 = worst) was completed pre- and post- each session. A time-series regression analysis was completed for the overall effect. SETTING/

participantsThe research took place in one hospice. The main inclusion criteria was: (1) under the care of the hospice (2) advanced disease (3) over 18 years (4) physically able to use virtual reality set (5) capacity (6) proficient English.

resultsTwenty-six participants enrolled, of which 20 (77%) completed all sessions. At baseline, the intervention group had a mean pre- score of 26.3 (SD 15.1) which reduced to 11.5 (SD 12.6) after the first session. At the same time point, the control group had a mean pre- score of 37.9 (SD 21.6) which reduced to 25.5 (SD 17.4) post-session. The mean scores dropped following each session, however this was not significant (mean difference = -1.3, 95% CI: -6.4 to 3.7, p = 0.601).

conclusionsIt is feasible to complete repeated virtual reality sessions within a palliative care population. Future research should explore the structure and effectiveness of virtual reality in a fully powered trial.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingHospice CareVirtual RealityFeasibility StudiesHumansPalliative Carehospicespalliative caresymptom assessmentvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID33583203
PMCPMC8641032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.