Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33582983›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2021

Pancreatoduodenectomy associated with colonic resections: indications, pitfalls, and outcomes.

Tommaso Giuliani, Anthony Di Gioia, Stefano Andrianello, Giovanni Marchegiani, Claudio Bassi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with right hemicolectomy for advanced malignancy: a single UK hepatopancreaticobiliary centre experience.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tommaso GiulianiDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona Hospital Trust, University of Verona, P.le A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. tommasogiuliani@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-5253
Anthony Di GioiaDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona Hospital Trust, University of Verona, P.le A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4131-931X
Stefano AndrianelloDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona Hospital Trust, University of Verona, P.le A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0556-8271
Giovanni MarchegianiDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona Hospital Trust, University of Verona, P.le A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Claudio BassiDepartment of General and Pancreatic Surgery, Verona Hospital Trust, University of Verona, P.le A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) associated with colonic resections (CR) (PD-CR) might be a viable option in case of locally advanced periampullary tumors or right colon cancer. The aim of this review was to reappraise the indications and outcomes of PD-CR focusing on the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and colonic anastomotic leak (CAL). A systematic literature search was performed in Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for studies published between 2000 and 2020 concerning PD-CR for periampullary or colonic neoplasms. Twenty-seven studies were selected. Morbidity after PD-CR ranged from 12 to 65% and surgery-related mortality was approximately 10%. When reported, the rates of POPF and AL were as high as 40% and 33%, respectively. The oncological results were strictly linked to the nature of the primary tumor and did not significantly differ from those achieved with standard resections. Surgical radicality and nodal status resulted the main determinants of outcome for pancreatic and colonic cancer, respectively. Solid evidence about the surgical outcomes of PD-CR is lacking, mainly due to the small proportion of patients undergoing such combined resection. Given the elevated surgical risk, a multidisciplinary evaluation is recommended for patient's selection. The increasing use of neoadjuvant therapies is expected to further change the indications and outcomes of PD-CR in the next future.

Indexed as

Pancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyColonHumansPancreasPostoperative ComplicationsColectomyColonic neoplasmsExtended pancreatectomyHemicolectomyMultivisceralPancreatic neoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID33582983
OpenAlexW3130966759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.