Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33582975›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2021

Statins as Potential Chemoprevention or Therapeutic Agents in Cancer: a Model for Evaluating Repurposed Drugs.

Nalinie Joharatnam-Hogan, Leo Alexandre, James Yarmolinsky, Blossom Lake, Nigel Capps, Richard M Martin, Alistair Ring, Fay Cafferty, Ruth E Langley

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Caryophyllene Oxide, a Bicyclic Terpenoid Isolated fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nalinie Joharatnam-HoganMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK. n.j-hogan@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8406-2732
Leo AlexandreNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK.
James YarmolinskyMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Blossom LakeThe Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.
Nigel CappsThe Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.
Richard M MartinMedical Research Council (MRC) Integrative Epidemiology Unit; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Alistair RingRoyal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.
Fay CaffertyMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK.
Ruth E LangleyMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBShrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust · GBBristol City Council · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19169Cancer Research UK 26413Cancer Research UK 29019Cancer Research UK C18281/A19169Cancer Research UK C65320/A26413Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_UU_12023/28
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRepurposing established medicines for a new therapeutic indication potentially has important global and societal impact. The high costs and slow pace of new drug development have increased interest in more cost-effective repurposed drugs, particularly in the cancer arena. The conventional drug development pathway and evidence framework are not designed for drug repurposing and there is currently no consensus on establishing the evidence base before embarking on a large, resource intensive, potential practice changing phase III randomised controlled trial (RCT). Numerous observational studies have suggested a potential role for statins as a repurposed drug for cancer chemoprevention and therapy, and we review the strength of the cumulative evidence here. RECENT

findingsIn the setting of cancer, a potential repurposed drug, like statins, typically goes through a cyclical history, with initial use for several years in another disease setting, prior to epidemiological research identifying a possible chemo-protective effect. However, further information is required, including review of RCT data in the initial disease setting with exploration of cancer outcomes. Additionally, more contemporary methods should be considered, such as Mendelian randomization and pharmaco-epidemiological research with "target" trial design emulation using electronic health records. Pre-clinical and traditional observational data potentially support the role of statins in the treatment of cancer; however, randomised trial evidence is not supportive. Evaluation of contemporary methods provides little added support for the use of statin therapy in cancer. We provide complementary evidence of alternative study designs to enable a robust critical appraisal from a number of sources of the go/no-go decision for a prospective phase III RCT of statins in the treatment of cancer.

Indexed as

Anticholesteremic AgentsChemopreventionDrug RepositioningHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsNeoplasmsResearch DesignAnticholesteremic AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCancerDrug developmentDrug repurposingStatins

Identifiers

PMID33582975
PMCPMC7882549
OpenAlexW3096381043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.