Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33582892›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2021

Economic and social cost of epilepsy in Poland: 5-year analysis.

Joanna Jędrzejczak, Beata Majkowska-Zwolińska, Anna Chudzicka-Bator, Iwona Żerda, Magdalena Władysiuk, Brian Godman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic Delay in Epilepsy: the Scope of the Problem.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanna JędrzejczakDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Beata Majkowska-ZwolińskaEpilepsy Diagnostic and Therapeutic Centre of Epilepsy Foundation of Epileptology, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna Chudzicka-BatorHTA Consulting sp. z o.o. sp. k, Krakow, Poland. a.chudzicka@hta.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7328-9840
Iwona ŻerdaHTA Consulting sp. z o.o. sp. k, Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena WładysiukJagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Brian GodmanStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, G4 ORE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEpilepsy affects nearly 50 million people around the world. As a common and chronic disease generates a high cost burden for healthcare system and patients.

aimWe aimed to determine the most current direct and indirect costs of epilepsy in Poland from the social perspective for the years 2014-2018, to analyze the changes of expenditures over time, indicate trends and to determine key cost-drivers. MATERIAL AND

methodsDirect and indirect costs using a top-down approach were estimated based on the public institutions' data for the ICD-10 codes G40 and G41. Direct costs included pharmacotherapy, hospitalizations, outpatient specialist care and rehabilitation. A human capital approach was used to estimate loss of productivity due to sick leaves and long-term inability to work.

resultsAnnual total direct and indirect costs related to epilepsy accounted for EUR 410 million in 2014 and decreased in subsequent years to EUR 361 million in 2018. The indirect costs were dominant (76-83% of total costs) and in the majority related to the long-term absenteeism (87-92% of total indirect costs). In 2014-2018, patients with epilepsy generated EUR 341 million to EUR 282 million of indirect costs. Annual direct costs for patients with epilepsy were EUR 69 million in 2014 and increased to EUR 80 million in 2018. The biggest expenses were the costs of drugs (> 50%) and hospitalizations (~ 40%).

conclusionsEpilepsy is an expensive disorder in terms of consumption of resources and social costs. Decision-makers should take it under special consideration.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessEpilepsyAbsenteeismHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHumansPolandAbsenteeismDirect costsEpilepsyIndirect costsProductivity loss

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.