Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33582886›Full record

ArticleHEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues2021

Getting Real: The Maryland Healthcare Ethics Committee Network's COVID-19 Working Group Debriefs Lessons Learned.

Norton Elson, Howard Gwon, Diane E Hoffmann, Adam M Kelmenson, Ahmed Khan, Joanne F Kraus, Casmir C Onyegwara, Gail Povar, Fatima Sheikh, Anita J Tarzian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Norton ElsonAdventist HealthCare, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Howard GwonJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3318-1699
Diane E HoffmannUniversity of Maryland Carey School of Law, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3439-9967
Adam M KelmensonFaculty of Medicine, Department of Bioethics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, HKSAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4412-5625
Ahmed KhanUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Joanne F KrausJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Retired), Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1219-1989
Casmir C OnyegwaraHoly Cross Hospital, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Gail PovarGWU School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Fatima SheikhJohns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anita J TarzianMaryland Healthcare Ethics Committee Network, University of Maryland Carey School of Law, Baltimore, MD, USA. atarzian@law.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0237-5311
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USAdventist HealthCare · USChinese University of Hong Kong · HKGW Medical Faculty Associates · USHoly Cross Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responding to a major pandemic and planning for allocation of scarce resources (ASR) under crisis standards of care requires coordination and cooperation across federal, state and local governments in tandem with the larger societal infrastructure. Maryland remains one of the few states with no state-endorsed ASR plan, despite having a plan published in 2017 that was informed by public forums across the state. In this article, we review strengths and weaknesses of Maryland's response to COVID-19 and the role of the Maryland Healthcare Ethics Committee Network (MHECN) in bridging gaps in the state's response to prepare health care facilities for potential implementation of ASR plans. Identified "lessons learned" include: Deliberative Democracy Provided a Strong Foundation for Maryland's ASR Framework; Community Consensus is Informative, Not Normative; Hearing Community Voices Has Inherent Value; Lack of Transparency & Political Leadership Gaps Generate a Fragmented Response; Pandemic Politics Requires Diplomacy & Persistence; Strong Leadership is Needed to Avoid Implementing ASR … And to Plan for ASR; An Effective Pandemic Response Requires Coordination and Information-Sharing Beyond the Acute Care Hospital; and The Ability to Correct Course is Crucial: Reconsidering No-visitor Policies.

Indexed as

Ethics CommitteesCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareHumansMarylandPandemicsResource AllocationSARS-CoV-2CommunityCOVID-19Ethics committeePandemicResource allocationTriage

Identifiers

PMID33582886
PMCPMC7882050
OpenAlexW3129287299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.