Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33582785›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of nutrition2021

Can Double Fortification of Salt with Iron and Iodine Reduce Anemia, Iron Deficiency Anemia, Iron Deficiency, Iodine Deficiency, and Functional Outcomes? Evidence of Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Safety.

Leila M Larson, Shruthi Cyriac, Eric W Djimeu, Mduduzi N N Mbuya, Lynnette M Neufeld

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Novel Expert System for Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency Anemia.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leila M LarsonUniversity of South Carolina, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA.
Shruthi CyriacEmory University, Doctoral Program in Nutrition and Health Sciences, Laney Graduate School, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eric W DjimeuGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mduduzi N N MbuyaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lynnette M NeufeldGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Geneva, Switzerland.
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition · CHEmory University · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnemia, iron deficiency, and iodine deficiency are problems of important public health concern in many parts of the world, with consequences for the health, development, and work capacity of populations. Several countries are beginning to implement double fortified salt (DFS) programs to simultaneously address iodine and iron deficiencies.

objectiveOur objective was to summarize the evidence for efficacy and effectiveness of DFS on the full range of status and functional outcomes and across different implementation and evaluation designs essential to successful interventions.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and gray literature examining the effects of DFS on nutritional status, cognition, work productivity, development, and morbidity of all population groups. We searched for articles in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register, and ProQuest for randomized trials, quasi-randomized trials, and program effectiveness evaluations.

resultsA total of 22 studies (N individuals = 52,758) were included. Efficacy studies indicated a significant overall positive effect on hemoglobin concentration [standardized mean difference (95% CI): 0.33 (0.18, 0.48)], ferritin [0.42 (0.08, 0.76)], anemia [risk ratio (95% CI): 0.80 (0.70, 0.92)], and iron deficiency anemia [0.36 (0.24, 0.55)]. Effects on urinary iodine concentration were not significantly different between DFS and iodized salt. The impact on functional outcomes was mixed. Only 2 effectiveness studies were identified. They reported programmatic challenges including low coverage, suboptimal DFS quality, and storage constraints.

conclusionsGiven the biological benefits of DFS across several populations in efficacy research, additional evaluations of robust DFS programs delivered at scale, which consider effective implementation and measure appropriate biomarkers, are needed.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedAnemiaAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyCognitionEfficiencyEvaluation Studies as TopicHealth StatusHumansIodineIron DeficienciesIron, DietaryMorbidityNutritional StatusSodium Chloride, DietaryIodineiodized saltIron, DietarySodium Chloride, Dietaryanemiacognitiondouble fortified salthemoglobinironreviewwork productivity

Identifiers

PMID33582785
PMCPMC7882357
OpenAlexW3130530194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.