Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33581976›Full record

ArticleClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2021

Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation Following a Complete Metabolic Response.

A J Lin, F Dehdashti, L S Massad, P H Thaker, M A Powell, D G Mutch, J K Schwarz, S Markovina, B A Siegel, P W Grigsby

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. A phase I study of the Wee1 kinase inhibitor adavosertib (AZD1775) in combination with chemoradiation in cervical, upper vaginal, and uterine cancers.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A J LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Electronic address: alexanderlin@wustl.edu.
F DehdashtiSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
L S MassadSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
P H ThakerSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
M A PowellSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
D G MutchSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
J K SchwarzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
S MarkovinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
B A SiegelSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
P W GrigsbyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USMallinckrodt (United States) · US

Funding

Optimizing radiation therapy through the manipulation of glutamine metabolismR01CA181745 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARZ, JULIE KRISTINA · 2014 to 2025
$3.4M
INTRA-TUMORAL METABOLIC HETEROGENEITY OF CERVICAL CANCERR01CA136931 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIGSBY, PERRY WAYNE · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Mechanisms of radiation-induced tumor cell death and survival in cervical cancerK08CA237822 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARKOVINA, STEPHANIE · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
RADIOMICS-BASED PROGNOSTIC MODEL OF CERVICAL CANCER HABITATSR21CA223799 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRIGSBY, PERRY WAYNE, LI, HUA · 2018 to 2019
$368k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237822NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136931NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181745NCI NIH HHS R21 CA223799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA complete metabolic response (CMR) on early post-treatment MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients who received curative-intent chemoradiation from 1998 to 2018 for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1-IVA cervical cancer and had a CMR on post-treatment FDG-PET within 5 months of treatment completion were included. Cox proportional hazards models determined factors associated with locoregional and distant failure. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from any recurrence (FFR) of patient subgroups were compared with Log-rank tests.

resultsThere were 402 patients with a CMR after chemoradiation on FDG-PET. Initial T stage was T1 (38%)/T2 (40%)/T3 (20%)/T4 (2%); initial FDG-avid nodal status was no nodes (50%)/pelvic lymph nodes (40%)/pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes (10%). After a median follow-up of 6 years, 109 (27%) recurred. The pattern of recurrence was locoregional (27%), distant (61%) or both (12%). No factors were associated with locoregional failure. Distant recurrence was more likely in patients with T3-4 lesions (hazard ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.8) and involvement of pelvic (hazard ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.7) or para-aortic lymph nodes (hazard ratio = 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-5.0) at diagnosis. The 5-year FFR rates for T1-2 patients with no nodes, pelvic nodes alone or para-aortic nodes at diagnosis were 85, 76 and 62%, respectively (P = 0.04, none versus para-aortic nodes). The 5-year FFR for T3-4 patients with no nodes, pelvic nodes alone or para-aortic nodes at diagnosis were 68, 56 and 25%, respectively (P = 0.09, none versus para-aortic nodes).

conclusionsT3-4 tumours and para-aortic nodal involvement at diagnosis are poor prognostic factors, even after a CMR following chemoradiation.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymphatic MetastasisPositron-Emission TomographyRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Cervical cancerchemoradiationcomplete metabolic responseFDG-PETprognosisrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID33581976
PMCPMC8453338
OpenAlexW3127968645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.