Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33581875›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2021

Quality of Life After Bladder Cancer: A Cross-sectional Survey of Patient-reported Outcomes.

James W F Catto, Amy Downing, Samantha Mason, Penny Wright, Kate Absolom, Sarah Bottomley, Luke Hounsome, Syed Hussain, Mohini Varughese, Caroline Raw and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
23.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Patient attitudes and experiences towards exercise during oncological treatment. A qualitative systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. The current use of the EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 and QLQ-BLM30 questionnaires for the assessment of health-related quality of life in bladder cancer patients: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Longitudinal data on health-related quality of life and its association with time to readmission in bladder perfusion patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

James W F CattoAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK. Electronic address: j.catto@sheffield.ac.uk.
Amy DowningLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Samantha MasonLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Penny WrightLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Kate AbsolomLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sarah BottomleyAcademic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Luke HounsomeNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK.
Syed HussainAcademic Oncology Unit, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mohini VarugheseBeacon Oncology Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset Foundation Trust, Somerset, UK.
Caroline RawPatient Representatives, Yorkshire, UK.
Phil KellyPatient Representatives, Yorkshire, UK.
Adam W GlaserLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: a.glaser@nhs.net.
University of Leeds · GBMusgrove Park Hospital · GBPublic Health England · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following treatment for bladder cancer (BC).

objectiveTo determine this, we undertook a cross-sectional survey covering 10% of the English population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsParticipants 1-10 yr from diagnosis were identified through national cancer registration data.

interventionA postal survey was administered containing generic HRQOL and BC-specific outcome measures. Findings were compared with those of the general population and other pelvic cancer patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Generic HRQOL was measured using five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30. BC-specific outcomes were derived from EORTC QLQ-BLM30 and EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 1796 surveys were completed (response rate 55%), including 868 (48%) patients with non-muscle-invasive BC, 893 (50%) patients who received radiotherapy or radical cystectomy, and 35 (1.9%) patients for whom treatment was unknown. Most (69%) of the participants reported at least one problem in any EQ-5D dimension. Age/sex-adjusted generic HRQOL outcomes were similar across all stages and treatment groups, whilst problems increased with age (problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions: <65 yr [67% {95% confidence interval or CI: 61-74}] vs 85+ yr [84% {95% CI: 81-89}], p =  0.016) and long-term conditions (no conditions [53% {95% CI: 48-58}] vs more than four conditions [94% {95% CI: 90-97}], p < 0.001). Sexual problems were reported commonly in men, increasing with younger age and radical treatment. Younger participants (under 65 yr) reported more financial difficulties (mean score 20 [95% CI: 16-25]) than those aged 85+ yr (6.8 [4.5-9.2], p <  0.001). HRQOL for BC patients (for comparison, males with problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions 69% [95% CI: 66-72]) was significantly worse than what has been found after colorectal and prostate cancers and in the general population (51% [95% CI: 48-53], all p <  0.05).

conclusionsHRQOL following BC appears to be relatively independent of disease stage, treatment, and multimodal care. Issues are reported with sexual function and financial toxicity. HRQOL after BC is worse than that after other pelvic cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients living with bladder cancer often have reduced quality of life, which may be worse than that for other common pelvic cancer patients. Age and other illnesses appear to be more important in determining this quality of life than the treatments received. Many men complain of sexual problems. Younger patients have financial worries.

Indexed as

Pelvic NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeRare DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesBacillus Calmette-GuerinBladder cancerEQ-5DHealth-related quality of lifePatient-reported outcomesQuality of lifeRadical cystectomy

Identifiers

PMID33581875
PMCPMC8082273
OpenAlexW3126200693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.