Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33581778›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia2021

Neuro-oncology practice guidelines from a high-volume surgeon at the COVID-19 epicenter.

Evan Luther, Joshua Burks, Daniel G Eichberg, Gregory Basil, Katherine Berry, Victor Lu, Ashish Shah, Gurvinder Kaur, Michael Ivan, Ricardo Komotar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted clinical care and research in Neuro-Oncology?Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evan LutherDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: evan.luther@jhsmiami.org.
Joshua BurksDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Daniel G EichbergDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Gregory BasilDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Katherine BerryDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Victor LuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ashish ShahDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Gurvinder KaurDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Michael IvanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ricardo KomotarDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
University of Miami · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

Research Training Program in Surgical OncologyT32CA211034 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MERCHANT, NIPUN B. · 2016 to 2025
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA211034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, physicians have begun adapting their daily practices to prevent transmissions. In this study we aimed to provide surgical neuro-oncologists with practice guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic based on objective data from a high-volume brain tumor surgeon at the current COVID-19 epicenter.

methodsAll outpatient visits and surgeries performed by the senior author during the COVID-19 pandemic were compared between the initial quarantine (3/23/20-5/4/20), the plateau period following quarantine (5/5/20-6/27/20), and the second peak (6/28/20-7/20/20). In-person and telemedicine visits were evaluated for crossovers. Surgeries were subdivided based on lesion type and evaluated across the same time period.

resultsFrom 3/23/20-7/20/20, 469 clinic visits and 196 surgeries were identified. After quarantine was lifted, face-to-face visits increased (P < 0.01) yet no change in telehealth visits occurred. Of 327 telehealth visits, only 5.8% converted to in-person during the 4-month period with the most cited reason being patient preference (68.4%). Of the 196 surgeries performed during the pandemic, 29.1% occurred during quarantine, 49.0% during the plateau, and 21.9% occurred in the second peak. No COVID negative patients developed symptoms at follow-up. 55.6% were performed on malignant tumors and 31.6% were benign with no difference in case volumes throughout the pandemic.

conclusionsDespite exceptional challenges, we have maintained a high-volume surgical neuro-oncology practice at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. We provide the protocols implemented at our institution in order to maximize neuro-oncology care while mitigating risk of COVID-19 exposure to both patients and providers.

Indexed as

OncologistsPatient PreferenceBrain NeoplasmsCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19HumansNeurosurgical ProceduresPandemicsSurgeonsTelemedicineCoronavirusCOVID-19Neuro-oncologyNeurosurgeryPandemicTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33581778
PMCPMC7834482
OpenAlexW3111686380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.