Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33581730›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Continuous use of glycomacropeptide in the nutritional management of patients with phenylketonuria: a clinical perspective.

Maria João Pena, Alex Pinto, Manuela Ferreira de Almeida, Catarina de Sousa Barbosa, Paula Cristina Ramos, Sara Rocha, Arlindo Guimas, Rosa Ribeiro, Esmeralda Martins, Anabela Bandeira and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria João PenaDepartamento de Biomedicina, Unidade de Bioquímica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
Alex PintoDepartment of Dietetics, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Manuela Ferreira de AlmeidaCentro de Genética Médica, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto (CHUP), 4099-028, Porto, Portugal.
Catarina de Sousa BarbosaCentro de Genética Médica, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto (CHUP), 4099-028, Porto, Portugal.
Paula Cristina RamosCentro de Genética Médica, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto (CHUP), 4099-028, Porto, Portugal.
Sara RochaCentro de Referência na área das Doenças Hereditárias do Metabolismo, CHUP, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
Arlindo GuimasCentro de Referência na área das Doenças Hereditárias do Metabolismo, CHUP, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
Rosa RibeiroCentro de Referência na área das Doenças Hereditárias do Metabolismo, CHUP, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
Esmeralda MartinsCentro de Referência na área das Doenças Hereditárias do Metabolismo, CHUP, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
Anabela BandeiraCentro de Referência na área das Doenças Hereditárias do Metabolismo, CHUP, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
Cláudia Camila DiasCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), 4200-450, Porto, Portugal.
Anita MacDonaldDepartment of Dietetics, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Nuno BorgesCenter for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), 4200-450, Porto, Portugal.
Júlio César RochaCentro de Genética Médica, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto (CHUP), 4099-028, Porto, Portugal. rochajc@nms.unl.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-4977-8345
Universidade do Porto · PTCentro Hospitalar do Porto · PTBirmingham Children's Hospital · GBCentro de Genética Clínica · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn phenylketonuria (PKU), modified casein glycomacropeptide supplements (CGMP-AA) are used as an alternative to the traditional phenylalanine (Phe)-free L-amino acid supplements (L-AA). However, studies focusing on the long-term nutritional status of CGMP-AA are lacking. This retrospective study evaluated the long-term impact of CGMP-AA over a mean of 29 months in 11 patients with a mean age at CGMP-AA onset of 28 years (range 15-43) [8 females; 2 hyperphenylalaninaemia (HPA), 3 mild PKU, 3 classical PKU and 3 late-diagnosed]. Outcome measures included metabolic control, anthropometry, body composition and biochemical parameters.

resultsCGMP-AA, providing 66% of protein equivalent intake from protein substitute, was associated with no significant change in blood Phe with CGMP-AA compared with baseline (562 ± 289 µmol/L vs 628 ± 317 µmol/L; p = 0.065). In contrast, blood tyrosine significantly increased on CGMP-AA (52.0 ± 19.2 μmol/L vs 61.4 ± 23.8 μmol/L; p = 0.027).

conclusionsBiochemical nutritional markers remained unchanged which is an encouraging finding in adults with PKU, many of whom are unable to maintain full adherence with nutritionally fortified protein substitutes. Longitudinal, prospective studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to fully understand the metabolic impact of using CGMP-AA in PKU.

Indexed as

CaseinsPhenylketonuriasAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePeptide FragmentsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultcaseinomacropeptideCaseinsPeptide FragmentsAmino acidsCasein glycomacropeptideNutritional statusPhenylalaninePhenylketonuriaTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID33581730
PMCPMC7881530
OpenAlexW3108777433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.