Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33581668›Full record

ArticleHearing research2021

Peripheral deficits and phase-locking declines in aging adults.

Samira Anderson, Rebecca Bieber, Alanna Schloss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neural Presbyacusis in Humans Inferred from Age-Related Differences in Auditory Nerve Function and Structure.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samira AndersonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States. Electronic address: sander22@umd.edu.
Rebecca BieberDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States. Electronic address: rbieber@umd.edu.
Alanna SchlossDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States. Electronic address: aschloss@terpmail.umd.edu.

Funding

Age-related changes in neural encoding and perception of temporal speech cuesR21DC015843 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI ANDERSON, SAMIRA B · 2016 to 2018
$436k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related difficulties in speech understanding may arise from a decrease in the neural representation of speech sounds. A loss of outer hair cells or decrease in auditory nerve fibers may lead to a loss of temporal precision that can affect speech clarity. This study's purpose was to evaluate the peripheral contributors to phase-locking strength, a measure of temporal precision, in recordings to a sustained vowel in 30 younger and 30 older listeners with normal to near normal audiometric thresholds. Thresholds were obtained for pure tones and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded in quiet and in three levels of continuous white noise (+30, +20, and +10 dB SNR). Absolute amplitudes and latencies of Wave I in quiet and of Wave V across presentation conditions, in addition to the slope of Wave V amplitude and latency changes in noise, were calculated from these recordings. Frequency-following responses (FFRs) were recorded to synthesized /ba/ syllables of two durations, 170 and 260 ms, to determine whether age-related phase-locking deficits are more pronounced for stimuli that are sustained for longer durations. Phase locking was calculated for the early and late regions of the steady-state vowel for both syllables. Group differences were found for nearly every measure except for the slopes of Wave V latency and amplitude changes in noise. We found that outer hair cell function (DPOAEs) contributed to the variance in phase locking. However, the ABR and FFR differences were present after covarying for DPOAEs, suggesting the existence of temporal processing deficits in older listeners that are somewhat independent of outer hair cell function.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemSpeech PerceptionAgedHumansNoiseSpeechAuditory agingAuditory brainstem responseFrequency-following responsePeripheral deficitPhase locking

Identifiers

PMID33581668
PMCPMC7980782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.