ArticleThe Lancet. Planetary health2021
The public health implications of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.
Article in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The global burden of climate-sensitive health impacts: a systematic review of mortality, morbidity, and economic costs.The Pan African medical journal · 2026Pooled it
- The public health co-benefits of strategies consistent with net-zero emissions: a systematic review.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2025Pooled it
- Climate Justice and One Health Adaptation Policies in Public Health and Disaster Medicine.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Global literature review and survey of implementation constraints on natural climate solutions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Pathways to health: Reporting on health co-benefits from urban climate mitigation action varies by sector.npj urban sustainability · 2026Article
- Air pollution interventions for health.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring nudging strategies for plant-based dietary choices in hospital patients: a quasi-experimental study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Article
- High resolution assessment of air quality and health in Europe under different climate mitigation scenarios.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty: what it is, its importance for health, and why Australia should endorse it.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- Balancing short-term and long-term climate-health equity strategies: a framework for supporting faster, fairer joint action on climate change and health equity.BMJ global health · 2025Review
- Summarizing Recommendations for the Prevention of Occupational Heat-Related Illness in Outdoor Workers: A Scoping Review.Workplace health & safety · 2025Article
- Health benefits of decarbonization and clean air policies in Beijing and China.Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2024Article
- Integration of Multiple Climate Change Mitigation Actions and Health Co-Benefits: A Framework Using the Global Calculator.Environmental health perspectives · 2024Article
- New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 07: Human Health and Safety.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024Review
- Climate-sensitive health counselling in Germany: a cross-sectional study about previous participation and preferences in the general public.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- The 2022 report of synergetic roadmap on carbon neutrality and clean air for China: Accelerating transition in key sectors.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2024Article
- Building CapaCITY/É for sustainable transportation: protocol for an implementation science research program in healthy cities.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Health co-benefits and trade-offs of carbon pricing: a narrative synthesis.Climate policy · 2024Review
- Advancing sustainable healthcare through multidisciplinary stroke team rehabilitation.Frontiers in stroke · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundnationally determined contributions (NDCs) serve to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement of staying "well below 2°C", which could also yield substantial health co-benefits in the process. However, existing NDC commitments are inadequate to achieve this goal. Placing health as a key focus of the NDCs could present an opportunity to increase ambition and realise health co-benefits. We modelled scenarios to analyse the health co-benefits of NDCs for the year 2040 for nine representative countries (ie, Brazil, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, South Africa, the UK, and the USA) that were selected for their contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and their global or regional influence.
methodsModelling the energy, food and agriculture, and transport sectors, and mortality related to risk factors of air pollution, diet, and physical activity, we analysed the health co-benefits of existing NDCs and related policies (ie, the current pathways scenario) for 2040 in nine countries around the world. We compared these health co-benefits with two alternative scenarios, one consistent with the goal of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (ie, the sustainable pathways scenario), and one in line with the sustainable pathways scenario, but also placing health as a central focus of the policies (ie, the health in all climate policies scenario).
findingsCompared with the current pathways scenario, the sustainable pathways scenario resulted in an annual reduction of 1·18 million air pollution-related deaths, 5·86 million diet-related deaths, and 1·15 million deaths due to physical inactivity, across the nine countries, by 2040. Adopting the more ambitious health in all climate policies scenario would result in a further reduction of 462 000 annual deaths attributable to air pollution, 572 000 annual deaths attributable to diet, and 943 000 annual deaths attributable to physical inactivity. These benefits were attributable to the mitigation of direct greenhouse gas emissions and the commensurate actions that reduce exposure to harmful pollutants, as well as improved diets and safe physical activity.
interpretationA greater consideration of health in the NDCs and climate change mitigation policies has the potential to yield considerable health benefits as well as achieve the "well below 2°C" commitment across a range of regional and economic contexts.
fundingThis work was in part funded through an unrestricted grant from the Wellcome Trust (award number 209734/Z/17/Z) and supported by an Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant (grant number EP/R035288/1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.