ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021
[The national health portal: development opportunities and potential uses with special consideration of the general practitioner's perspective].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe German National Health Portal, which is currently in preparation, is intended to provide evidence-based health information. It seems sensible to reflect on development perspectives in order to be able to estimate application horizons as well as usage and impact potential of the portal under the conditions of the health system so that specific additional value can be generated.
objectivesConsidering the implementation experience of other European countries, the current status of the project and the perspective of political decisionmakers and medical practitioners are outlined. Fundamental recommendations on how a national health portal can be successfully established, especially with regard to primary care, are derived from the analysis.
methodsOn the basis of a literature search and two preliminary studies, the article examines the development categories in which a national health portal could be designed in the future.
resultsBased on the overview, a number of dimensions appear to be decisive for the planning and implementation process of a national health portal. These relate to embedment in a higher-level e‑health strategy, convergence and integration measures with regard to evidence-based information, ensuring sufficient findability on the Internet, a substantive focus that addresses target groups, a functional structure, as well as sponsorship and involvement of healthcare actors.
conclusionsAn evidence-based portal can be a valuable instrument to better educate patients, strengthen the doctor-patient relationship, and advance the digitalization of the healthcare system more strongly. Therefore, a sufficient degree of innovation and integration ability as well as awareness and visibility within the health system should be ensured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.