Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580806›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2021

Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Stefan Rusu, Philomène Lavis, Vilma Domingues Salgado, Marie-Paule Van Craynest, Jacques Creteur, Isabelle Salmon, Alexandre Brasseur, Myriam Remmelink

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Implementation of post-mortem examinations within a large population-based cohort: results from the Hamburg City Health Study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ten misconceptions regarding decision-making in critical care.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan RusuHôpital Erasme, Department of Pathology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Philomène LavisHôpital Erasme, Department of Pathology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Vilma Domingues SalgadoHôpital Erasme, Department of Pathology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie-Paule Van CraynestHôpital Erasme, Department of Pathology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Jacques CreteurHôpital Erasme, Department of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Isabelle SalmonHôpital Erasme, Department of Pathology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Alexandre BrasseurHôpital Erasme, Department of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Myriam RemmelinkHôpital Erasme, Department of Pathology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. myriam.remmelink@erasme.ulb.ac.be.
Erasmus Hospital · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autopsy is an important quality assurance indicator and a tool to advance medical knowledge. This study aims to compare the premortem clinical and postmortem pathology findings in patients who died in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), to analyze if there are any discrepancies between them, and to compare the results to two similar studies performed in our institution in 2004 and 2007. Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, 888 patients died in the ICU and 473 underwent post-mortem examination (PME) of whom 437 were included in the present study. Autopsies revealed discrepancies between clinical diagnosis and pathologic findings according to in 101 cases (23.1%) according to Goldman classification. Forty-eight major discrepancies (class I and class II) were identified in 44 cases and the most frequent identified discrepancies were pulmonary embolism (3/12) as class I and malignancies (13/35) as class II. They were more frequent in patients hospitalized for less than 10 days then in the group with more than 10 days of hospitalization (13.8% vs 4.5%; p = 0.002). No statistical difference has been noticed concerning age, gender, and ICU stay. We observed an increase of performed autopsies and a total discrepancy rate similar to the studies performed in the same institution in 2004 (22.5%) and 2007 (21%). In conclusion, discrepancies between clinical and PME diagnoses persist despite the medical progress. Secondly, the autopsy after a short hospital stay may reveal unexpected findings whose diagnosis is challenging even if it may be suspected by the intensivist.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsHospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyCause of DeathFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAutopsyDiagnostic discrepancyGoldmanIntensive carePost-mortem examination

Identifiers

PMID33580806
PMCPMC8364530
OpenAlexW3127925435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.