Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580647›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2021

Is the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme Intervention Delivered as Planned? An Observational Study of Fidelity of Intervention Delivery.

David P French, Rhiannon E Hawkes, Peter Bower, Elaine Cameron

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preventing type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study exploring the complexity of health-related practices in people with prediabetes.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Preventing type 2 diabetes: A research agenda for behavioural science.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David P FrenchManchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7663-7804
Rhiannon E HawkesManchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peter BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Elaine CameronManchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 16/48/07National Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-DPP) has been delivered by four commercial organizations across England, to prevent people with impaired glucose tolerance developing Type 2 diabetes. Evidence reviews underpinning the NHS-DPP design specification identified 19 Behavior Change Techniques (BCTs) that are the intervention "active ingredients." It is important to understand the discrepancies between BCTs specified in design and BCTs actually delivered. PURPOSE: To compare observed fidelity of delivery of BCTs that were delivered to (a) the NHS-DPP design specification, and (b) the programme manuals of four provider organizations.

methodsAudio-recordings were made of complete delivery of NHS-DPP courses at eight diverse sites (two courses per provider organization). The eight courses consisted of 111 group sessions, with 409 patients and 35 facilitators. BCT Taxonomy v1 was used to reliably code the contents of NHS-DPP design specification documents, programme manuals for each provider organization, and observed NHS-DPP group sessions.

resultsThe NHS-DPP design specification indicated 19 BCTs that should be delivered, whereas only seven (37%) were delivered during the programme in all eight courses. By contrast, between 70% and 89% of BCTs specified in programme manuals were delivered. There was substantial under-delivery of BCTs that were designed to improve self-regulation of behavior, for example, those involving problem solving and self-monitoring of behavior.

conclusionsA lack of fidelity in delivery to the underlying evidence base was apparent, due to poor translation of design specification to programme manuals. By contrast, the fidelity of delivery to the programme manuals was relatively good. Future commissioning should focus on ensuring the evidence base is more accurately translated into the programme manual contents.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2State MedicineBehavior TherapyEnglandHumansBehavior changeBehavior change techniquesDiabetes prevention programmeNondiabetic hyperglycemiantervention fidelityType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33580647
PMCPMC8557367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.