Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580479›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of epidemiology2021

Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis.

Sigurd Mikkelsen, David Coggon, Johan Hviid Andersen, Patricia Casey, Esben Meulengracht Flachs, Henrik Albert Kolstad, Ole Mors, Jens Peter Bonde

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Psychosocial Occupational Exposures and Mental Illness.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The changing nature of work in the 21st century as a social determinant of mental health.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sigurd MikkelsenDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Sigurd.Mikkelsen.01@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0854-8276
David CoggonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Johan Hviid AndersenDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, University Research Clinic, Herning, Denmark.
Patricia CaseyDepartment of Psychiatry, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Esben Meulengracht FlachsDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Albert KolstadDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ole MorsDepartment of Psychosis, Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jens Peter BondeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Danish Work Environment Research Fund 45-2018-09Medical Research Council MC_U147585823Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, many studies have examined associations between poor psychosocial work environment and depression. We aimed to assess the evidence for a causal association between psychosocial factors at work and depressive disorders. We conducted a systematic literature search from 1980 to March 2019. For all exposures other than night and shift work and long working hours, we limited our selection of studies to those with a longitudinal design. We extracted available risk estimates for each of 19 psychosocial exposures, from which we calculated summary risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (PROSPERO, identifier CRD42019130266). 54 studies were included, addressing 19 exposures and 11 different measures of depression. Only data on depressive episodes were sufficient for evaluation. Heterogeneity of exposure definitions and ascertainment, outcome measures, risk parameterization and effect contrasts limited the validity of meta-analyses. Summary risk estimates were above unity for all but one exposure, and below 1.60 for all but another. Outcome measures were liable to high rates of false positives, control of relevant confounding was mostly inadequate, and common method bias was likely in a large proportion of studies. The combination of resulting biases is likely to have inflated observed effect estimates. When statistical uncertainties and the potential for bias and confounding are taken into account, it is not possible to conclude with confidence that any of the psychosocial exposures at work included in this review is either likely or unlikely to cause depressive episodes or recurrent depressive disorders.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalDepressive DisorderHumansOccupational ExposureWorkplaceCausalityCommon method biasDepressive disordersDiagnostic misclassificationPsychosocial stressors at work

Identifiers

PMID33580479
PMCPMC8159794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.