Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580447›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021

Added value of cardiovascular calcifications for prediction of recurrent cardiovascular events and cardiovascular interventions in patients with established cardiovascular disease.

Cilie C van 't Klooster, Yolanda van der Graaf, Hendrik M Nathoe, Michiel L Bots, Gert J de Borst, Frank L J Visseren, Tim Leiner, UCC-SMART-study group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cilie C van 't KloosterDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Yolanda van der GraafJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hendrik M NathoeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michiel L BotsJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gert J de BorstDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frank L J VisserenDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. f.l.j.visseren@umcutrecht.nl.
Tim LeinerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
UCC-SMART-study group
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose is to investigate the added prognostic value of coronary artery calcium (CAC), thoracic aortic calcium (TAC), and heart valve calcium scores for prediction of a combined endpoint of recurrent major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular interventions (MACE +) in patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD). In total, 567 patients with established CVD enrolled in a substudy of the UCC-SMART cohort, entailing cardiovascular CT imaging and calcium scoring, were studied. Five Cox proportional hazards models for prediction of 4-year risk of MACE + were developed; traditional CVD risk predictors only (model I), with addition of CAC (model II), TAC (model III), heart valve calcium (model IV), and all calcium scores (model V). Bootstrapping was performed to account for optimism. During a median follow-up of 3.43 years (IQR 2.28-4.74) 77 events occurred (MACE+). Calibration of predicted versus observed 4-year risk for model I without calcium scores was good, and the c-statistic was 0.65 (95%CI 0.59-0.72). Calibration for models II-V was similar to model I, and c-statistics were 0.67, 0.65, 0.65, and 0.68 for model II, III, IV, and V, respectively. NRIs showed improvement in risk classification by model II (NRI 15.24% (95%CI 0.59-29.39)) and model V (NRI 20.00% (95%CI 5.59-34.92)), but no improvement for models III and IV. In patients with established CVD, addition of the CAC score improved performance of a risk prediction model with classical risk factors for the prediction of the combined endpoint MACE+ . Addition of the TAC or heart valve score did not improve risk predictions.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Artery DiseaseVascular CalcificationAorta, ThoracicHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAdded prognostic valueCardiovascular calcification scoresRecurrent cardiovascular events and interventionsStable cardiovascular disease

Identifiers

PMID33580447
PMCPMC8255266
OpenAlexW3128541617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.