Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580374›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2021

Characterization of visual manifestations and identification of risk factors for permanent vision loss in patients with giant cell arteritis.

Hussein Baalbaki, Darya Jalaledin, Catherine Lachance, Guillaume Febrer, Maxime Rhéaume, Jean-Paul Makhzoum

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05703763 (The Applanation Tonometry in Giant Cell Arteritis Pilot), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05703763 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Applanation Tonometry in Giant Cell Arteritis Pilot

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de MontrealRan2025 to 2027Enrolled146ConditionsGiant Cell ArteritisArmsApplanation tonometry, Standardized GCA assessment, Repeat applanation tonometry (optional)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hussein BaalbakiVasculitis Clinic, Canadian Network for Research on Vasculitides (CanVasc), Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Darya JalaledinDepartment of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Catherine LachanceDepartment of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Guillaume FebrerDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maxime RhéaumeVasculitis Clinic, Canadian Network for Research on Vasculitides (CanVasc), Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jean-Paul MakhzoumVasculitis Clinic, Canadian Network for Research on Vasculitides (CanVasc), Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. jean-paul.makhzoum@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4523-8525
Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposePermanent vision loss (PVL) is a feared complication and a leading cause of morbidity in giant cell arteritis (GCA). The objective of this study is to describe visual manifestations and identify risk factors of ocular involvement in GCA.

methodsA retrospective database from a single vasculitis referral center was used. Descriptive statistics comparing patients with and without ocular involvement were performed.

resultsOne hundred patients with GCA were included. Visual symptoms were present in 53% of patients at diagnosis and included blurred vision (30%), diplopia (16%), amaurosis fugax (14%), and blindness (19%). Out of 19 patients with blindness, 16 did not recover and had PVL. Patients with PVL were older (79.2 ± 6.7 vs 74.2 ± 7.6 years; p = 0.008) and more likely to have coronary artery disease (31% vs 10%; p = 0.018). However, they were less likely to have other cranial symptoms (81% vs 96%; p = 0.019), mainly headaches (64% vs 92%; p = 0.003). Risk factors associated with an abnormal ophthalmologic examination were the same as for PVL, but patients were also more likely to have diabetes (29% vs 7%; p = 0.040) and less likely to have constitutional symptoms (53% vs 80%; p = 0.033).

conclusionPatients with GCA and ocular involvement were more likely to have baseline diabetes and atherosclerosis. A predisposing vascular vulnerability might therefore increase the risk of ocular involvement. Key points • Most patients with GCA and complete vision loss at presentation will not recover and evolve to have permanent vision loss. • A GCA patient with visual manifestations at presentation has more baseline vascular risk factors (diabetes, atherosclerosis) than patients without ocular involvement. • Patients with GCA and visual manifestations have fewer constitutional symptoms and lower inflammatory markers than patients without ocular involvement.

Indexed as

Giant Cell ArteritisBlindnessHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsVision DisordersBlindnessGiant cell arteritisVasculitisVision disorders

Identifiers

PMID33580374
OpenAlexW3127009008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.