Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580345›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

The effect of lateral extra-articular tenodesis on in vivo cartilage contact in combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Kyohei Nishida, Tom Gale, Daisuke Chiba, Felipe Suntaxi, Bryson Lesniak, Freddie Fu, William Anderst, Volker Musahl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02913404 (Functional Biomechanical Outcome of ACL-reconstruction vs. ACL-reconstruction and Extra-articular-tenodesis in Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02913404 nacompletednot on this map

Functional Biomechanical Outcome of ACL-reconstruction vs. ACL-reconstruction and Extra-articular-tenodesis in Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2016 to 2020Enrolled20ConditionsACLArmsACL Reconstruction, ACL Recon. extra-articular-tenodesis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anterolateral corner of knee: Current concepts.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lateral extraarticular tenodesis improves stability in non-anatomic ACL reconstructed knees: in vivo kinematic analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  10. In search of a gold standard for objective clinical outcome: using dynamic biplane radiography to measure knee kinematics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  11. Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part 1: biology and biomechanics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyohei NishidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Tom GaleBiodynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Rivertech Building Complex, 3820 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Daisuke ChibaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Felipe SuntaxiBiodynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Rivertech Building Complex, 3820 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Bryson LesniakDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Freddie FuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
William AnderstBiodynamics Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, Rivertech Building Complex, 3820 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. anderst@pitt.edu.
Volker MusahlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USFreddie Mac (United States) · USHirosaki University · JPKobe Steel (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) may confer improved rotational stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Little is known about how LET affects in vivo cartilage contact after ACLR. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of LET in combination with ACLR (ACLR + LET) on in vivo cartilage contact kinematics compared to isolated ACLR (ACLR) during downhill running. It was hypothesised that cartilage contact area in the lateral compartment would be larger in ACLR + LET compared with ACLR, and that the anterior-posterior (A-P) position of the contact center on the lateral tibia would be more anterior after ACLR + LET than after ACLR.

methodsTwenty patients were randomly assigned into ACLR + LET or ACLR during surgery (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02913404). At 6 months and 12 months after surgery, participants were imaged during downhill running using biplane radiography. Tibiofemoral motion was tracked using a validated registration process. Patient-specific cartilage models, obtained from 3 T MRI, were registered to track bone models and used to calculate the dynamic cartilage contact area and center of cartilage contact in both the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments, respectively. The side-to-side differences (SSD) were compared between groups using a Mann-Whitney U test.

resultsAt 6 months after surgery, the SSD in A-P cartilage contact center in ACLR + LET (3.9 ± 2.6 mm, 4.4 ± 3.1 mm) was larger than in ACLR (1.2 ± 1.6 mm, 1.5 ± 2.0 mm) at 10% and 20% of the gait cycle, respectively (p < 0.01, p < 0.05). There was no difference in the SSD in cartilage contact center at 12 months after surgery. There was no difference in SSD of cartilage contact area in the medial and lateral compartments at both 6 and 12 months after surgery. There were no adverse events during the trial.

conclusionLET in combination with ACLR may affect the cartilage contact center during downhill running in the early post-operation phase, but this effect is lost in the longer term. This suggests that healing and neuromuscular adaptation occur over time and may also indicate a dampening of the effect of LET over time. (337 /350 words) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionJoint InstabilityTenodesisBiomechanical PhenomenaCartilageHumansKnee JointAnterior cruciate ligamentCartilage contact kinematicsLateral extra-articular tenodesisPivot shiftResidual rotatory instability

Identifiers

PMID33580345
OpenAlexW3127112468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.