Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580323›Full record

ArticleBrain informatics2021

Automated seizure diagnosis system based on feature extraction and channel selection using EEG signals.

Athar A Ein Shoka, Monagi H Alkinani, A S El-Sherbeny, Ayman El-Sayed, Mohamed M Dessouky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A New Feature Analysis Approach to Selecting Channels of EEG for Fatigue Driving.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Athar A Ein ShokaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, Egypt.
Monagi H AlkinaniDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
A S El-SherbenyDepartment of Industrial Electronics and Control Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, Egypt.
Ayman El-SayedDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, Egypt.
Mohamed M DessoukyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, Egypt. mohamed.moawad@el-eng.menofia.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2609-2225
Menoufia University · EGUniversity of Jeddah · SA

Funding

University of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia UJ-04-18-ICP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seizure is an abnormal electrical activity of the brain. Neurologists can diagnose the seizure using several methods such as neurological examination, blood tests, computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG). Medical data, such as the EEG signal, usually includes a number of features and attributes that do not contains important information. This paper proposes an automatic seizure classification system based on extracting the most significant EEG features for seizure diagnosis. The proposed algorithm consists of five steps. The first step is the channel selection to minimize dimensionality by selecting the most affected channels using the variance parameter. The second step is the feature extraction to extract the most relevant features, 11 features, from the selected channels. The third step is to average the 11 features extracted from each channel. Next, the fourth step is the classification of the average features using the classification step. Finally, cross-validation and testing the proposed algorithm by dividing the dataset into training and testing sets. This paper presents a comparative study of seven classifiers. These classifiers were tested using two different methods: random case testing and continuous case testing. In the random case process, the KNN classifier had greater precision, specificity, positive predictability than the other classifiers. Still, the ensemble classifier had a higher sensitivity and a lower miss-rate (2.3%) than the other classifiers. For the continuous case test method, the ensemble classifier had higher metric parameters than the other classifiers. In addition, the ensemble classifier was able to detect all seizure cases without any mistake.

Indexed as

And seizure classificationChannel selectionCross-validationElectroencephalography (EEG)EpilepsyFeature extractionSeizure

Identifiers

PMID33580323
PMCPMC7881082
OpenAlexW3127847667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.