Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580292›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Perception of body shape and size without touch or proprioception: evidence from individuals with congenital and acquired neuropathy.

R Christopher Miall, Daria Afanasyeva, Jonathan D Cole, Peggy Mason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Christopher MiallSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. r.c.miall@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3002-1251
Daria AfanasyevaSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Jonathan D ColeCentre of Postgraduate Research and Education, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Peggy MasonDepartment of Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Effect of congenital vs acquired somatosensory deafferentation on self-body schemaR03NS113752 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MASON, PEGGY, MIALL, CHRIS · 2019 to 2020
$154k
NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS113752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The degree to which mental representations of the body can be established and maintained without somatosensory input remains unclear. We contrast two "deafferented" adults, one who acquired large fibre sensory loss as an adult (IW) and another who was born without somatosensation (KS). We compared their responses to those of matched controls in three perceptual tasks: first accuracy of their mental image of their hands (assessed by testing recognition of correct hand length/width ratio in distorted photographs and by locating landmarks on the unseen hand); then accuracy of arm length judgements (assessed by judgement of reaching distance), and finally, we tested for an attentional bias towards peri-personal space (assessed by reaction times to visual target presentation). We hypothesised that IW would demonstrate responses consistent with him accessing conscious knowledge, whereas KS might show evidence of responses dependent on non-conscious mechanisms. In the first two experiments, both participants were able to give consistent responses about hand shape and arm length, but IW displayed a better awareness of hand shape than KS (and controls). KS demonstrated poorer spatial accuracy in reporting hand landmarks than both IW and controls, and appears to have less awareness of her hands. Reach distance was overestimated by both IW and KS, as it was for controls; the precision of their judgements was slightly lower than that of the controls. In the attentional task, IW showed no reaction time differences across conditions in the visual detection task, unlike controls, suggesting that he has no peri-personal bias of attention. In contrast, KS did show target location-dependent modulation of reaction times, when her hands were visible. We suggest that both IW and KS can access a conscious body image, although its accuracy may reflect their different experience of hand action. Acquired sensory loss has deprived IW of any subconscious body awareness, but the congenital absence of somatosensation may have led to its partial replacement by a form of visual proprioception in KS.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionAdultBody ImageFemaleHandHumansMaleProprioceptionSomatotypesSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionBody representationDeafferentationSensory neuropathySomatosensation

Identifiers

PMID33580292
PMCPMC8068692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.