Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580287›Full record

ArticleApplied microscopy2020

Differential synapse density between Purkinje cell dendritic spine and parallel fiber varicosity in the rat cerebellum among the phylogenic lobules.

Hyun-Wook Kim, Seung Hak Oh, Se Jeong Lee, Ji Eun Na, Im Joo Rhyu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hyun-Wook KimDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Korea.
Seung Hak OhDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Korea.
Se Jeong LeeDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Korea.
Ji Eun NaDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Korea.
Im Joo RhyuDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, 02841, Korea. irhyu@korea.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-6278
Korea University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea F18SN23D2101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum is a region of the brain that plays an important role in motor control. It is classified phylogenetically into archicerebellum, paleocerebellum and neocerebellum. The Purkinje cells are lined in a row called Purkinje cell layer and it has a unique dendritic branches with many spines.The previous study reported that there is a difference of synapse density according to the lobules based on large two-dimensional data. However, recent study with high voltage electron microscopy showed there was no differences in dendritic spine density of the Purkinje cell according to its phylogenetic lobule. We analyzed Purkinje cell density in the II, VI and X lobules by stereological modules and synaptic density was estimated by double disector based on Purkinje cell density in the molecular layer of each lobule.The results showed that there was significant difference in the Purkinje cell density and synapse number according to their phylogenetic lobules. The number of Purkinje cell in a given volume was larger in the archicerebellum, but synapse density was higher in the neocerebellum.These data suggest that cellular and synaptic organization of the Purkinje cell is different according to their phylogenetic background.

Indexed as

CerebellumEvolutionPhylogenySynapse

Identifiers

PMID33580287
PMCPMC7818350
OpenAlexW3014044234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.