Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2021
Sub-setting systemic lupus erythematosus by combined molecular phenotypes defines divergent populations in two phase III randomized trials.
Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of transcriptomic features reveals molecular endotypes of SLE with clinical implications.Genome medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesHeterogeneity of SLE patients in clinical trials remains a challenge for developing new therapies. This study used a combinatorial analysis of four molecular biomarkers to define key sources of heterogeneity.
methodsCombinations of IFN (high/low), anti-dsDNA (+/-) and C3 and C4 (low/normal) were used to subset n = 1747 patients from two randomized phase III trials. A dichotomous classification scheme defined SLE (+) as: IFN (high), anti-dsDNA (+), C3 (low) and/or C4 (low). SLE (-) required all of the following: IFN (low), anti-dsDNA (-), C3 (normal) and C4 (normal). Additional analyses subset the data further by IFN, anti-dsDNA and complement.
resultsThe trials enrolled n = 2262 patients of which n = 1747 patients had data for IFN, anti-dsDNA, C3 and C4 at baseline. There were n = 247 patients in the SLE (-) population and n = 1500 patients in the SLE (+) population. The SLE (-) population had more mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal disease at baseline, while SLE (+) had more haematological, renal and vascular involvement. There was lower concomitant medication use in the SLE (-) population for corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, except for MTX. Time to severe flare was significantly longer in SLE (-) vs SLE (+) (P < 0.0001) and SRI-4 response rate was significantly lower in SLE (-) vs SLE (+) (P = 0.00016). The USA had more SLE (-) patients (22%) than Mexico/Central America/South America (10%), Europe (7%) and the rest of the world (5%).
conclusionCombinatorial analysis of four molecular biomarkers revealed subsets of SLE patients that discriminated by disease manifestations, concomitant medication use, geography, time to severe flare and SRI-4 response. These data may be useful for designing clinical trials and identifying subsets of patients for analysis. Rheumatology key messages SLE patients from a P3 trial were categorized by IFN, anti-dsDNA, C3 and C4 status. Patients lacking molecular markers of SLE distinguished from biomarker positive patients on multiple clinical parameters. Biomarker negative patients have distinct disease characteristics that may impact clinical trial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.