Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580238›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2021

Ultra high-risk PFA ependymoma is characterized by loss of chromosome 6q.

Lorena V Baroni, Lakshmikirupa Sundaresan, Ayala Heled, Hallie Coltin, Kristian W Pajtler, Tong Lin, Thomas E Merchant, Roger McLendon, Claudia Faria, Molly Buntine and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. "Updates on diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers of CNS tumors".Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A brief history of ependymoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Central Nervous System Tumors in Adolescents and Young Adults.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Pediatric CNS tumors: Overview and treatment paradigms.Seminars in pediatric neurology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Lorena V BaroniDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lakshmikirupa SundaresanProgramme in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ayala HeledProgramme in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hallie ColtinDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kristian W PajtlerHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Tong LinDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Thomas E MerchantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Roger McLendonThe Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6682-4588
Claudia FariaDivision of Neurosurgery, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
Molly BuntineHudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Australia.
Christine L WhiteHudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Australia.
Stefan M PfisterHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Mark R GilbertNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Terri S ArmstrongNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Eric BouffetDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sachin KumarProgramme in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael D TaylorProgramme in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kenneth D AldapeCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
David W EllisonDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Nicholas G GottardoDepartment of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Marcel KoolHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrey KorshunovHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jordan R HansfordChildren's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital; Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Vijay RamaswamyDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6557-895X

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Mouse models to discover new drivers of medulloblastomaR01CA159859 · NCI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI Michael D. Taylor, WILLIAM A WEISS · 2011 to 2026
$10.4M
Prevention and treatment of lethal metastases in group 3 medulloblastomaR01NS106155 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI TAYLOR, MICHAEL D., WEISS, WILLIAM A · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Outcomes and Risk of Rare TumorsZIABC011837 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ARMSTRONG, TERRI S. · 2018 to 2024
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA159859NIH HHS 5R01CA159859-08NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin PF-EPN-A, 1q gain is a marker of poor prognosis, however, it is unclear if within PF-EPN-A additional cytogenetic events exist which can refine risk stratification.

methodsFive independent non-overlapping cohorts of PF-EPN-A were analyzed applying genome-wide methylation arrays for chromosomal and clinical variables predictive of survival.

resultsAcross all cohorts, 663 PF-EPN-A were identified. The most common broad copy number event was 1q gain (18.9%), followed by 6q loss (8.6%), 9p gain (6.5%), and 22q loss (6.8%). Within 1q gain tumors, there was significant enrichment for 6q loss (17.7%), 10q loss (16.9%), and 16q loss (15.3%). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was strikingly worse in those patients with 6q loss, with a 5-year PFS of 50% (95% CI 45%-55%) for balanced tumors, compared with 32% (95% CI 24%-44%) for 1q gain only, 7.3% (95% CI 2.0%-27%) for 6q loss only and 0 for both 1q gain and 6q loss (P = 1.65 × 10-13). After accounting for treatment, 6q loss remained the most significant independent predictor of survival in PF-EPN-A but is not in PF-EPN-B. Distant relapses were more common in 1q gain irrespective of 6q loss. RNA sequencing comparing 6q loss to 6q balanced PF-EPN-A suggests that 6q loss forms a biologically distinct group.

conclusionsWe have identified an ultra high-risk PF-EPN-A ependymoma subgroup, which can be reliably ascertained using cytogenetic markers in routine clinical use. A change in treatment paradigm is urgently needed for this particular subset of PF-EPN-A where novel therapies should be prioritized for upfront therapy.

Indexed as

EpendymomaChromosome AberrationsChromosomesHumansMicroarray AnalysisProgression-Free Survival1q gain6q lossependymomaPFAPFBposterior fossasubgrouping

Identifiers

PMID33580238
PMCPMC8328032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.