Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580197›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Bridgehead effect and multiple introductions shape the global invasion history of a termite.

Alexander J Blumenfeld, Pierre-André Eyer, Claudia Husseneder, Jianchu Mo, Laura N L Johnson, Changlu Wang, J Kenneth Grace, Thomas Chouvenc, Shichen Wang, Edward L Vargo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The reconstruction of invasion histories with genomic data in light of differing levels of anthropogenic transport.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexander J Blumenfeld *Department of Entomology, 2143 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. alex93@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-1693
Pierre-André Eyer *Department of Entomology, 2143 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7801-0466
Claudia HussenederDepartment of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Jianchu MoMinistry of Agriculture Key Lab of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insect Pests, Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agricultural and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China.
Laura N L JohnsonDepartment of Entomology, 2143 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Changlu WangDepartment of Entomology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
J Kenneth GraceDepartment of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Thomas ChouvencEntomology and Nematology Department, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Shichen WangTexas A&M AgriLife Genomics and Bioinformatics Service, College Station, TX, USA.
Edward L VargoDepartment of Entomology, 2143 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native to eastern Asia, the Formosan subterranean termite Coptotermes formosanus (Shiraki) is recognized as one of the 100 worst invasive pests in the world, with established populations in Japan, Hawaii and the southeastern United States. Despite its importance, the native source(s) of C. formosanus introductions and their invasive pathway out of Asia remain elusive. Using ~22,000 SNPs, we retraced the invasion history of this species through approximate Bayesian computation and assessed the consequences of the invasion on its genetic patterns and demography. We show a complex invasion history, where an initial introduction to Hawaii resulted from two distinct introduction events from eastern Asia and the Hong Kong region. The admixed Hawaiian population subsequently served as the source, through a bridgehead, for one introduction to the southeastern US. A separate introduction event from southcentral China subsequently occurred in Florida showing admixture with the first introduction. Overall, these findings further reinforce the pivotal role of bridgeheads in shaping species distributions in the Anthropocene and illustrate that the global distribution of C. formosanus has been shaped by multiple introductions out of China, which may have prevented and possibly reversed the loss of genetic diversity within its invasive range.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularIntroduced SpeciesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimal MigrationAnimalsAsia, EasternBayes TheoremIsopteraModels, GeneticPhylogenyPopulation DynamicsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33580197
PMCPMC7881189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.