Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33580196›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2021

Efficacy of MEK inhibition in a recurrent malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.

Sumanth Nagabushan, Loretta M S Lau, Paulette Barahona, Marie Wong, Alexandra Sherstyuk, Glenn M Marshall, Vanessa Tyrrell, Eva A Wegner, Paul G Ekert, Mark J Cowley and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. RRM2 as a novel prognostic and therapeutic target of NF1-associated MPNST.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sumanth Nagabushan *Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-8919
Loretta M S Lau *Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Paulette BarahonaChildren's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marie WongSchool of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alexandra SherstyukChildren's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-8002
Glenn M MarshallKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Vanessa TyrrellChildren's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Eva A WegnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Sydney Children's Hospital and Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Paul G EkertSchool of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2976-8617
Mark J CowleySchool of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chelsea MayohSchool of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6398-3046
Toby N TrahairKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Philip CrowePrince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Antoinette AnazodoKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
David S ZieglerKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia. d.ziegler@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-7916
Cancer Institute of New South Wales · AUUNSW Sydney · AUSydney Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis of recurrent malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) is dismal, with surgical resection being the only definitive salvage therapy. Treatment with chemoradiation approaches has not significantly improved patient outcomes. Similarly, trials of therapies targeting MPNST genomic drivers have thus far been unsuccessful. Improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of MPNST indicates frequent activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cell signaling pathway. MEK inhibitors have shown activity in preclinical studies; however, their clinical efficacy has not been reported to date. We describe here a case of sustained complete response to MEK inhibition in an adolescent patient with a recurrent metastatic MPNST with multiple alterations in the MAPK pathway, guided by a precision oncology approach.

Identifiers

PMID33580196
PMCPMC7881142
OpenAlexW3127938430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.