ArticleScientific reports2021
The hidden waves in the ECG uncovered revealing a sound automated interpretation method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico models in oncology, neurology, and epidemiology: systems-level and multiscale perspectives.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Golden Standard or Obsolete Method? Review of ECG Applications in Clinical and Experimental Context.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel approach for analysing cardiac rhythm data is presented in this paper. Heartbeats are decomposed into the five fundamental P, Q, R, S and T waves plus an error term to account for artifacts in the data which provides a meaningful, physical interpretation of the heart's electric system. The morphology of each wave is concisely described using four parameters that allow all the different patterns in heartbeats to be characterized and thus differentiated This multi-purpose approach solves such questions as the extraction of interpretable features, the detection of the fiducial marks of the fundamental waves, or the generation of synthetic data and the denoising of signals. Yet the greatest benefit from this new discovery will be the automatic diagnosis of heart anomalies as well as other clinical uses with great advantages compared to the rigid, vulnerable and black box machine learning procedures, widely used in medical devices. The paper shows the enormous potential of the method in practice; specifically, the capability to discriminate subjects, characterize morphologies and detect the fiducial marks (reference points) are validated numerically using simulated and real data, thus proving that it outperforms its competitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.