ArticleScientific reports2021
Motion correction for routine X-ray lung CT imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PixelPrint 4D : A 3D Printing Method of Fabricating Patient-Specific Deformable CT Phantoms for Respiratory Motion Applications.Investigative radiology · 2025Article
- Lifelike and Deformable Lung Phantoms for 4DCT Imaging: A Three-Dimensional Printing Approach.Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel motion correction algorithm for X-ray lung CT imaging has been developed recently. It was designed to perform for routine chest or thorax CT scans without gating, namely axial or helical scans with pitch around 1.0. The algorithm makes use of two conjugate partial angle reconstruction images for motion estimation via non-rigid registration which is followed by a motion compensated reconstruction. Differently from other conventional approaches, no segmentation is adopted in motion estimation. This makes motion estimation of various fine lung structures possible. The aim of this study is to explore the performance of the proposed method in correcting the lung motion artifacts which arise even under routine CT scans with breath-hold. The artifacts are known to mimic various lung diseases, so it is of great interest to address the problem. For that purpose, a moving phantom experiment and clinical study (seven cases) were conducted. We selected the entropy and positivity as figure of merits to compare the reconstructed images before and after the motion correction. Results of both phantom and clinical studies showed a statistically significant improvement by the proposed method, namely up to 53.6% (p < 0.05) and up to 35.5% (p < 0.05) improvement by means of the positivity measure, respectively. Images of the proposed method show significantly reduced motion artifacts of various lung structures such as lung parenchyma, pulmonary vessels, and airways which are prominent in FBP images. Results of two exemplary cases also showed great potential of the proposed method in correcting motion artifacts of the aorta which is known to mimic aortic dissection. Compared to other approaches, the proposed method provides an excellent performance and a fully automatic workflow. In addition, it has a great potential to handle motions in wide range of organs such as lung structures and the aorta. We expect that this would pave a way toward innovations in chest and thorax CT imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.