Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579865›Full record

ReviewJournal of Huntington's disease2021

DNA Mismatch Repair and its Role in Huntington's Disease.

Ravi R Iyer, Anna Pluciennik

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Huntington's disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. ALS and Huntington Disease: Unraveling the Connections between TDP-43 and Huntingtin.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Prime editing of the βNature communications · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ravi R IyerCHDI Management/CHDI Foundation, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Anna PluciennikDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
CHDI Foundation · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Neuronal DNA repair pathways in Huntington's disease pathophysiologyR03NS114976 · NINDS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI PLUCIENNIK, ANNA · 2019 to 2020
$156k
NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS114976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a highly conserved genome stabilizing pathway that corrects DNA replication errors, limits chromosomal rearrangements, and mediates the cellular response to many types of DNA damage. Counterintuitively, MMR is also involved in the generation of mutations, as evidenced by its role in causing somatic triplet repeat expansion in Huntington's disease (HD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. In this review, we discuss the current state of mechanistic knowledge of MMR and review the roles of key enzymes in this pathway. We also present the evidence for mutagenic function of MMR in CAG repeat expansion and consider mechanistic hypotheses that have been proposed. Understanding the role of MMR in CAG expansion may shed light on potential avenues for therapeutic intervention in HD.

Indexed as

DNA Mismatch RepairHumansHuntington DiseaseTrinucleotide Repeat ExpansionDNA mismatch repairDNA structuresHuntington’s diseaseneurodegenerationsomatic expansiontriplet repeat instability

Identifiers

PMID33579865
PMCPMC7990411
OpenAlexW3127201805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.