Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579821›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Learning the dynamics of cell-cell interactions in confined cell migration.

David B Brückner, Nicolas Arlt, Alexandra Fink, Pierre Ronceray, Joachim O Rädler, Chase P Broedersz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nonlinear memory in cell-division dynamics across species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Physics-tailored machine learning reveals unexpected physics in dusty plasmas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Optimal mechanical interactions direct multicellular network formation on elastic substrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Role of NaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

David B BrücknerArnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7205-2975
Nicolas ArltArnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany.
Alexandra FinkCenter for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany.
Pierre RoncerayCenter for the Physics of Biological Function, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-9012-7544
Joachim O RädlerCenter for NanoScience, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany; c.broedersz@lmu.de raedler@lmu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5846-1489
Chase P BroederszArnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany; c.broedersz@lmu.de raedler@lmu.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7283-3704
Center for NanoScience · DEPrinceton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The migratory dynamics of cells in physiological processes, ranging from wound healing to cancer metastasis, rely on contact-mediated cell-cell interactions. These interactions play a key role in shaping the stochastic trajectories of migrating cells. While data-driven physical formalisms for the stochastic migration dynamics of single cells have been developed, such a framework for the behavioral dynamics of interacting cells still remains elusive. Here, we monitor stochastic cell trajectories in a minimal experimental cell collider: a dumbbell-shaped micropattern on which pairs of cells perform repeated cellular collisions. We observe different characteristic behaviors, including cells reversing, following, and sliding past each other upon collision. Capitalizing on this large experimental dataset of coupled cell trajectories, we infer an interacting stochastic equation of motion that accurately predicts the observed interaction behaviors. Our approach reveals that interacting noncancerous MCF10A cells can be described by repulsion and friction interactions. In contrast, cancerous MDA-MB-231 cells exhibit attraction and antifriction interactions, promoting the predominant relative sliding behavior observed for these cells. Based on these experimentally inferred interactions, we show how this framework may generalize to provide a unifying theoretical description of the diverse cellular interaction behaviors of distinct cell types.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationCell MovementCell LineCell Line, TumorHumansModels, TheoreticalSpatio-Temporal AnalysisStochastic Processescell–cell interactionscell migrationcontact inhibition of locomotionstochastic inference

Identifiers

PMID33579821
PMCPMC7896326
OpenAlexW3048153593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.