Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579770›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yosuke Fukuda, Hiroshi Sugimoto, Yoshie Yamada, Hiroyuki Ito, Takeshi Tanaka, Takuo Yoshida, Satoshi Okamori, Koichi Ando, Yohei Okada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Yosuke FukudaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan y.f.0423@med.showa-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7087-1595
Hiroshi SugimotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe Red Cross Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Yoshie YamadaDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroyuki ItoDepartment of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Takeshi TanakaInfection Control and Education Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Takuo YoshidaIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi OkamoriDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi AndoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Showa University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei OkadaPrimary Care and Emergency Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2266-476X
Kyoto University · JPShowa University · JPJapanese Red Cross Kobe Hospital · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKameda Medical Center · JPKeio University · JPNagasaki University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a type of acute respiratory failure characterised by non-cardiac pulmonary oedema caused by various underlying conditions. ARDS is often pathologically characterised by diffuse alveolar damage, and its pathological findings have been reported to be associated with prognosis, although the adverse effects of lung biopsies to obtain pathological findings are still unclear. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to reveal the safety and feasibility of lung biopsy in the diagnosis of ARDS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include studies that were published in MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until 1 June 2020. We will include the reports for critically ill patients in an intensive care unit or emergency department who undergo lung biopsy and require a mechanical ventilation. Two review authors will independently scan titles and abstracts of all identified studies. Furthermore, these two authors will read and assess the full text of study reports to identify trials that appeared broadly to address the subject of the review. We will perform a risk of bias assessment using the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be based on the published data, therefore, it does not require ethical approval. The final results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000040650.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeBiopsyFeasibility StudiesHumansLungMeta-Analysis as TopicRespiration, ArtificialSystematic Reviews as Topicadult intensive & critical careadult thoracic medicinethoracic medicinethoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID33579770
PMCPMC7883844
OpenAlexW3127607957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.