Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579622›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2021

Opioid Use Disorder Stigma, Discrimination, and Policy Attitudes in a National Sample of U.S. Young Adults.

Zachary W Adams, Bruce G Taylor, Elizabeth Flanagan, Elizabeth Kwon, Annalee V Johnson-Kwochka, Katherine S Elkington, Jennifer E Becan, Matthew C Aalsma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A National Portrait of Public Attitudes toward Opioid Use in the US: A Latent Class Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zachary W AdamsAdolescent Behavioral Health Research Program, Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: zwadams@iu.edu.
Bruce G TaylorPublic Health Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.
Elizabeth FlanaganPublic Health Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.
Elizabeth KwonAdolescent Behavioral Health Research Program, Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Annalee V Johnson-KwochkaAdolescent Behavioral Health Research Program, Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Katherine S ElkingtonDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Jennifer E BecanInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas.
Matthew C AalsmaAdolescent Behavioral Health Research Program, Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Funding

Survey CoreU2CDA050098 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI POLLACK, HAROLD ALEXANDER, SCHNEIDER, JOHN · 2019 to 2019
$17.2M
Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN): TCU Clinical Research CenterUG1DA050074 · NIDA · TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY · PI KNIGHT, DANICA K, KNIGHT, KEVIN · 2019 to 2023
$10.1M
Leveraging Social Networks to Increase COVID-19 Testing Uptake: A Comparison of Credible Messenger and Chain Referral Recruitment ApproachesUG1DA050071 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI ELKINGTON, KATHERINE S, NUNES, EDWARD V. · 2019 to 2023
$9.5M
Alliance to Disseminate Addiction Prevention and Treatment (ADAPT): A Statewide Learning Health System to Reduce Substance Use among Justice-Involved Youth in Rural Communities.UG1DA050070 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI AALSMA, MATTHEW · 2019 to 2023
$5.7M
M-Health Tools to Enhance Treatment of Teen Substance Abuse and Mental IllnessK23DA038257 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ADAMS, ZACHARY WILLIAM · 2015 to 2019
$906k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA038257NIDA NIH HHS U2C DA050098NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050070NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050071NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA small fraction of people with opioid use disorder (OUD) receives appropriate care. Public opinion about addiction contributes to the availability and accessibility of effective treatment services. Little is known about such attitudes toward OUD among young adults, a population at heightened risk for OUD onset. The current study examined endorsement of social stigma, discrimination, and policy attitudes about OUD and hypothesized correlates of such attitudes (familiarity with OUD, criminal justice involvement, respondent demographic characteristics).

methodsA national sample of 190 young adults (weighted n = 408; 69% female, 42% White, non-Hispanic) aged 19-29 years completed web and telephone surveys covering opioid social stigma, discrimination, policy attitudes, personal experience with opioids, and criminal justice, and participant characteristics (age, sex, race, education, employment, income). Linear regressions were performed to examine associations between respondent characteristics and attitudes.

resultsYoung adults, on average, endorsed moderate levels of stigma and discrimination toward people with OUD and support for treatment-oriented policies. Stigma was positively associated with discrimination and negatively associated with support for policies favorable to people with OUD. Regression results revealed that more negative attitudes toward OUD were endorsed as a function of older age and less personal experience or familiarity with OUD.

conclusionsHeterogeneity in young adults' attitudes about OUD may be explained, in part, by personal characteristics and familiarity with OUD. Adolescence may be an opportune developmental period to prevent or reduce public stigma related to OUD and MOUD and increase public attitudes in support of expanded access to effective OUD treatments.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersSocial StigmaAdolescentAgedAnalgesics, OpioidAttitudeFemaleHumansMalePolicyYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidDiscriminationOpioid use disorderPolicy attitudesPublic opinionSocial stigmaYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID33579622
PMCPMC8316251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.