Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579375›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2021

InContext: curation of medical context for drug indications.

Kody Moodley, Linda Rieswijk, Tudor I Oprea, Michel Dumontier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating NLP Approaches to Extract Drug Indications.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kody MoodleyInstitute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Paul-Henri Spaaklaan 1, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands. kody.moodley@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5666-1658
Linda RieswijkInstitute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Paul-Henri Spaaklaan 1, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tudor I OpreaTranslational Informatics Division, Department of Internal Medicine, MSC09-5025, One University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, USA.
Michel DumontierInstitute of Data Science, Maastricht University, Paul-Henri Spaaklaan 1, 6229 GT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
Machine Learning Model Validation for AD/ADRDU24CA224370 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI EDWARDS, JEREMY S · 2018 to 2023
$6.4M
Biomedical Data Translator Technical Feasibility Assessment and Architecture DesignOT3TR002027 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DUMONTIER, MICHEL, TATONETTI, NICHOLAS P · 2016 to 2019
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS OT3 TR002027NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NCI NIH HHS U24 CA224370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and precise information about the therapeutic uses (indications) of a drug is essential for applications in drug repurposing and precision medicine. Leading online drug resources such as DrugCentral and DrugBank provide rich information about various properties of drugs, including their indications. However, because indications in such databases are often partly automatically mined, some may prove to be inaccurate or imprecise. Particularly challenging for text mining methods is the task of distinguishing between general disease mentions in drug product labels and actual indications for the drug. For this, the qualifying medical context of the disease mentions in the text should be studied. Some examples include contraindications, co-prescribed drugs and target patient qualifications. No existing indication curation efforts attempt to capture such information in a precise way. Here we fill this gap by presenting a novel curation protocol for extracting indications and machine processable annotations of contextual information about the therapeutic use of a drug. We implemented the protocol on a reference set of FDA-approved drug product labels on the DailyMed website to curate indications for 150 anti-cancer and cardiovascular drugs. The resulting corpus - InContext - focuses on anti-cancer and cardiovascular drugs because of the heightened societal interest in cancer and heart disease. In order to understand how InContext relates with existing reputable drug indication databases, we analysed it's overlap with a state-of-the-art indications database - LabeledIn - as well as a reputable online drug compendium - DrugCentral. We found that 40% of indications sampled from DrugCentral (and 23% from LabeledIn) respectively, could not be accounted for in InContext. This raises questions about the veracity of indications not appearing in InContext. The additional contextual information curated by InContext about disease mentions in drug SPLs provides a foundation for more precise, structured and formal representations of knowledge related to drug therapeutic use, in order to increase accuracy and agreement of drug indication extraction methods for in silico drug repurposing.

Indexed as

Data MiningPharmaceutical PreparationsDatabases, PharmaceuticalHumansPrecision MedicinePharmaceutical PreparationsData qualityDrug indicationsDrug repurposingOntologiesSemantic similarity

Identifiers

PMID33579375
PMCPMC7881657
OpenAlexW3126547029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.