Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579340›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Neoadjuvant irradiation of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with ions (Retro-Ion): study protocol for a randomized phase II pilot trial.

K Seidensaal, M Kieser, A Hommertgen, C Jaekel, S B Harrabi, K Herfarth, G Mechtesheimer, B Lehner, M Schneider, H Nienhueser and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04219202 (Neoadjuvant Irradiation of Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma With Ions Retro-Ion Prospektive Randomisierte Phase-II-Studie), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04219202 narecruitingnot on this map

Neoadjuvant Irradiation of Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma With Ions Retro-Ion Prospektive Randomisierte Phase-II-Studie

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital HeidelbergRan2019 to 2027Enrolled64ConditionsSarcoma,Soft TissueArmsProton radiation, Carbon Ion radiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Staging Systems and Nomograms for Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The history of ion beam therapy in Germany.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K SeidensaalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. katharina.seidensaal@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5969-6426
M KieserInstitute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
A HommertgenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
C JaekelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
S B HarrabiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
K HerfarthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
G MechtesheimerInstitute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
B LehnerCenter for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
M SchneiderDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
H NienhueserDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
S FröhlingDepartment of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
G EgererDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
J DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
M UhlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, the predominant pattern of failure is local recurrence, which remains the main cause of death. Radiotherapy is utilized to reduce recurrence rates but the efficacy of this strategy has not been definitely established. As treatment tolerability is more favorable with preoperative radiotherapy, normofractionated neoadjuvant treatment is the current approach. The final results of the prospective, randomized STRASS (EORTC 62092) trial, which compared the efficacy of this combined treatment to that of surgery alone, are still awaited; preliminary results presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting indicated that combined treatment is associated with better local control in patients with liposarcoma (74.5% of the cohort, 11% benefit in abdominal progression free survival after 3 years, p = 0.049). Particles allow better sparing of surrounding tissues at risk, e.g., bowel epithelium, and carbon ions additionally offer biologic advantages and are preferred in slow growing tumors. Furthermore, hypofractionation allows for a significantly shorter treatment interval with a lower risk of progression during radiotherapy. METHODS AND

designWe present a prospective, randomized, monocentric phase II trial. Patients with resectable or marginally resectable, histologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum will be randomized between neoadjuvant proton or neoadjuvant carbon ion radiotherapy in active scanning beam application technique (39 Gy [relative biological effectiveness, RBE] in 13 fractions [5-6 fractions per week] in each arm). The primary objective is the safety and feasibility based on the proportion of grade 3-5 toxicity (CTCAE, version 5.0) in the first 12 months after surgery or discontinuation of treatment for any reason related to the treatment. Local control, local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life are the secondary endpoints of the study. DISCUSSION: The aim of this study is to confirm that hypofractionated, accelerated preoperative radiotherapy is safe and feasible. The rationale for the use of particle therapy is the potential for reduced toxicity. The data will lay the groundwork for a randomized phase III trial comparing hypofractionated proton and carbon ion irradiation with regard to local control.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04219202 . Retrospectively registered on January 6, 2020.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapySarcomaClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansIonsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicIonsCarbon ion therapyHeavy ion therapyHypofractionationIrradiationProton therapyRandomized trialRetroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID33579340
PMCPMC7881463
OpenAlexW3127412274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.