Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579309›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2021

Implementation of evidence-based practice and associated factors among nurses and midwives working in Amhara Region government hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

Asrat Hailu Dagne, Mekonnen Haile Beshah, Bekalu Getnet Kassa, Eyaya Habtie Dagnaw

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asrat Hailu DagneDepartment of Midwifery, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. 1221Asrat@gmail.com.
Mekonnen Haile BeshahDepartment of Midwifery, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.
Bekalu Getnet KassaDepartment of Midwifery, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.
Eyaya Habtie DagnawDepartment of Midwifery, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation of evidence-based practice is crucial to enhance quality health care, professional development, and cost-effective health service. However, many factors influence the implementation of evidence-based practice. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the implementation of evidence-based practice and associated factors among nurses and midwives.

methodsInstitutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted to assess the implementation of evidence-based practice and associated factors from February 15 to March 15, 2019, among 790 nurses and midwives. Data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 then exported to SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis. Categorical variables were presented as frequency tables. Continuous variables were presented as descriptive measures, expressed as mean and standard deviation. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure reliability, mean, standard deviation, and inter-items correlation of the factors. Independent variables with a probability value (P-value) of less than 0.2 in the Chi-square analysis were entered in the multivariable logistic regression model. Statistically significant associated factors were identified at probability value (P-value) less than 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval.

resultsThe mean age of participants was 28.35 (SD ± 4.5) years. This study revealed that 34.7% (95% CI 31.5-38%) of participants implemented evidence-based practice moderately or desirably. Age of participants (AOR = 5.98, CI 1.34-26.7), barriers of implementation of evidence-based practice (AOR = 4.8, CI 2.2-10.6), the attitude of participants (AOR = 5.02, CI 1.2-21.5), nursing/midwifery work index (AOR = 3.9, CI 1.4-10.87), self-efficacy of implementation of evidence-based practice skills (AOR = 12.5, CI 5.7-27.5) and knowledge of participants (AOR = 3.06, CI 1.6-5.77) were statistically significant associated factors of implementation of evidence-based practice CONCUSSION: Implementation of evidence-based practice of nurses and midwives was poor. Age of participants, barriers of implementation of evidence-based practice, the attitude of participants, self-efficacy of implementation of evidence-based practice skills, nursing/midwifery work index, and knowledge of participants were found to be predictors of implementation of evidence-based practice. Insufficient time and difficulty in judging the quality of research papers and reports were the most common barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNurse MidwivesNursesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansMaleMiddle AgedMidwiferySelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesEvidence-based practiceImplementationNurses/midwives work index

Identifiers

PMID33579309
PMCPMC7881559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.