Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579306›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2021

Nanopore sequencing from liquid biopsy: analysis of copy number variations from cell-free DNA of lung cancer patients.

Filippo Martignano, Uday Munagala, Stefania Crucitta, Alessandra Mingrino, Roberto Semeraro, Marzia Del Re, Iacopo Petrini, Alberto Magi, Silvestro G Conticello

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Update on Liquid Biopsy.Radiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Filippo Martignano *Core Research Laboratory, ISPRO, Florence, Italy.
Uday Munagala *Core Research Laboratory, ISPRO, Florence, Italy.
Stefania CrucittaUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandra MingrinoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Roberto SemeraroUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Marzia Del ReUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Iacopo PetriniUnit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Critical Area and Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alberto MagiDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Silvestro G ConticelloCore Research Laboratory, ISPRO, Florence, Italy. silvestro.conticello@cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4244-1846
University of Florence · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

ISPRO NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the "precision oncology" era the characterization of tumor genetic features is a pivotal step in cancer patients' management. Liquid biopsy approaches, such as analysis of cell-free DNA from plasma, represent a powerful and noninvasive strategy to obtain information about the genomic status of the tumor. Sequencing-based analyses of cell-free DNA, currently performed with second generation sequencers, are extremely powerful but poorly scalable and not always accessible also due to instrumentation costs. Third generation sequencing platforms, such as Nanopore sequencers, aim at overcoming these obstacles but, unfortunately, are not designed for cell-free DNA analysis.Here we present a customized workflow to exploit low-coverage Nanopore sequencing for the detection of copy number variations from plasma of cancer patients. Whole genome molecular karyotypes of 6 lung cancer patients and 4 healthy subjects were successfully produced with as few as 2 million reads, and common lung-related copy number alterations were readily detected.This is the first successful use of Nanopore sequencing for copy number profiling from plasma DNA. In this context, Nanopore represents a reliable alternative to Illumina sequencing, with the advantages of minute instrumentation costs and extremely short analysis time.The availability of protocols for Nanopore-based cell-free DNA analysis will make this analysis finally accessible, exploiting the full potential of liquid biopsy both for research and clinical purposes.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsCase-Control StudiesCell-Free Nucleic AcidsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyLung NeoplasmsNanopore SequencingSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAWorkflowCell-Free Nucleic AcidscfDNACirculating tumor DNACopy number aberrations. DiagnosisctDNAMetastasisPlasmaThird generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33579306
PMCPMC7881593
OpenAlexW3129050234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.