Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579256›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

One-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty - a randomized multicenter clinical trial study protocol.

Martin Lindberg-Larsen, Anders Odgaard, Charlotte Fredborg, Henrik Morville Schrøder, One-stage vs Two-stage Collaboration Group

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03435679 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

One-stage Versus Two-stage Revision of the Infected Knee Arthroplasty. a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2018 to 2026Enrolled97ConditionsPeriprosthetic Knee InfectionArmsone-stage, two-stage
NCT04427943 active not recruitingnot on this map

Outcome After Revisions of Infected Knee Arthroplasties - a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOdense University HospitalRan2020 to 2026Enrolled350ConditionsPeriprosthetic Knee InfectionArmsrevision surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Survival, functional outcome and satisfaction of first revision total knee arthroplasty at a mean eleven-year follow-up.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martin Lindberg-LarsenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. martin.lindberg-larsen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-677X
Anders OdgaardDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte FredborgIntensive Care Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Morville SchrøderDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Næstved Hospital, Næstved, Denmark.
One-stage vs Two-stage Collaboration Group
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKNæstved Sygehus · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Odense Universitetshospital Puljen for skånsom kirurgiRegion Sjælland nr. A360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA two-stage prosthesis exchange procedure has been the gold standard in surgical treatment of the chronically infected knee arthroplasty so far. This includes 2 surgeries/hospitalizations and an interim period of 2-3 months between surgeries with impaired health, functional status and quality of life of the patients. A one-stage exchange procedure holds many obvious advantages compared to the two-stage approach, but outcomes of a one-stage versus two-stage procedures have never been investigated in a randomized clinical trial. The purpose of this study is primarily to investigate time-adjusted differences in functional status of patients after one-stage versus two-stage revision. Secondary, to report time-adjusted differences in quality of life, complications (including re-revisions due to infection) and mortality.

methodsThis study is a pragmatic, multi-center, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing one-stage versus two-stage revision of the infected knee arthroplasty. Seven Danish hospitals are currently participating in the study, but additional hospitals can enter the study if adhering to protocol. Ninety-six patients will be included prospectively. Follow-up will be with PROM-questionnaires and clinical controls up to 10 years. The patients who are not able to participate in the randomized trial are followed in a parallel cohort study. PROM'S: Oxford Knee Score and EQ5D + EQ5D VAS questionnaires are completed preoperatively and sent out to the study participants at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months as well as 5 and 10 years postoperatively. In addition a tailor made cost questionnaire on the non-treating hospital resource use, community health and social service use, travel costs, time off work and informal care are sent out. DISCUSSION: If one of the two treatment alternatives is found superior in both domains of quality of life (both knee-specific and generic) and health economics, that treatment should be promoted. Other outcomes will open informed discussions about treatment strategies for periprosthetic knee infections.

trial registrationThe randomized trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with ID NCT03435679 , initial release date January 31, 2018 and the cohort study is registered with ID NCT04427943 , submitted January 8, 2020 and posted June 11, 2020.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisProsthesis-Related InfectionsCohort StudiesEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansKnee JointMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReoperationTreatment OutcomeInfectionKnee arthroplastyOne-stagePROMRevisionTwo-stage

Identifiers

PMID33579256
PMCPMC7881574
OpenAlexW3126279152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.