Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579242›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

The acceptability and feasibility of a pilot study examining the impact of a mobile technology-based intervention informed by behavioral economics to improve HIV knowledge and testing frequency among Latinx sexual minority men and transgender women.

Sarah MacCarthy, Alexandra Mendoza-Graf, Zachary Wagner, Joanna L Barreras, Alice Kim, Rebecca Giguere, Alex Carballo-Dieguez, Sebastian Linnemayr

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03144336 (Using Mobile Technology and Incentives With Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women for HIV Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03144336 nacompletednot on this map

Using Mobile Technology and Incentives With Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women for HIV Prevention (MOTIVES)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2017 to 2019Enrolled217ConditionsHIV Infections, HIVArmsInformation provision, Weekly quizzes, Rewards for testing HIV-negative
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah MacCarthyRAND Corporation, Behavioral and Policy Sciences, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, USA. sarahm@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6468-8009
Alexandra Mendoza-GrafRAND Corporation, Pardee RAND Graduate School, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Zachary WagnerRAND Corporation, Economics, Sociology, and Statistics, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Joanna L BarrerasBienestar Human Services, Inc., 5326 East Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90022, USA.
Alice KimRAND Corporation, Behavioral and Policy Sciences, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Rebecca GiguereHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Division of Gender, Health and Sexuality, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 15, New York, NY, USA.
Alex Carballo-DieguezHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Division of Gender, Health and Sexuality, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 15, New York, NY, USA.
Sebastian LinnemayrRAND Corporation, Economics, Sociology, and Statistics, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
RAND Corporation · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USBienestar · US

Funding

Mobile Technology and Incentives (MOTIVES) for Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Los Angeles, CAR34MH109373 · NIMH · RAND CORPORATION · PI LINNEMAYR, SEBASTIAN · 2016 to 2018
$767k
NIMH NIH HHS 1R34MH109373-01A1NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH109373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe developed a novel intervention that uses behavioral economics incentives and mobile-health text messages to increase HIV knowledge and testing frequency among Latinx sexual minority men and Latinx transgender women. Here we provide a theoretically-grounded assessment regarding the intervention's acceptability and feasibility.

methodsWe conducted 30-min exit interviews with a stratified sample of participants (n = 26 Latinx sexual minority men, 15 Latinx transgender women), supplemented with insights from study staff (n = 6). All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated for a content analysis using Dedoose. Cohen's Kappa was 89.4% across coded excerpts. We evaluated acceptability based on how participants cognitively and emotionally reacted to the intervention and whether they considered it to be appropriate. We measured feasibility based on resource, scientific and process assessments (e.g., functionality of text messaging service, feedback on study recruitment procedures and surveys).

resultsRegarding acceptability, most participants clearly understood the intervention as a program to receive information about HIV prevention methods through text messages. Participants who did not complete the intervention shared they did not fully understand what it entailed at their initial enrollment, and thought it was a one-time engagement and not an ongoing program. Though some participants with a higher level of education felt the information was simplistic, most appreciated moving beyond a narrow focus on HIV to include general information on sexually transmitted infections; drug use and impaired sexual decision-making; and differential risks associated with sexual positions and practices. Latinx transgender women in particular appreciated receiving information about Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis. While participants didn't fully understand the exact chances of winning a prize in the quiz component, most enjoyed the quizzes and chance of winning a prize. Participants appreciated that the intervention required a minimal time investment. Participants shared that the intervention was generally culturally appropriate. Regarding feasibility, most participants reported the text message platform worked well though inactive participants consistently said technical difficulties led to their disengagement. Staff shared that clients had varying reactions to being approached while being tested for HIV, with some unwilling to enroll and others being very open and curious about the program. Both staff and participants relayed concerns regarding the length of the recruitment process and study surveys.

conclusionsOur theoretically-grounded assessment shows the intervention is both acceptable and feasible.

trial registrationThe trial was registered on May 5, 2017 with the ClinicalTrials.gov registry [ NCT03144336 ].

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesTransgender PersonsEconomics, BehavioralFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsTechnologyAcceptabilityBehavioral economicsFeasibilityHIV preventionLatinxSexual minority menTransgender women

Identifiers

PMID33579242
PMCPMC7880516
OpenAlexW3126778576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.