Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579226›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Clinically significant genomic alterations in the Chinese and Western patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Shifeng Xu, Yuan Guo, Yanwu Zeng, Zhijian Song, Xiaodan Zhu, Ning Fan, Zhilei Zhang, Guibing Ren, Yunjin Zang, Wei Rao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Landscape and Therapeutic Targeting ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Profile and Prognostic Value ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shifeng Xu *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong, China.
Yuan Guo *Liver Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Yanwu ZengOrigimed, Shanghai, China.
Zhijian SongOrigimed, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodan ZhuOrgan Transplant Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Ning FanLiver Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zhilei ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China.
Guibing RenOncology Department, The Armed Police Characteristic Medical Center, Hebei, China.
Yunjin ZangOrgan Transplant Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Haier Road No. 59, Qingdao, 266000, Laoshan District, China. zangyj3657@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-1562
Wei RaoOrgan Transplant Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Haier Road No. 59, Qingdao, 266000, Laoshan District, China. qdfy_raowei@126.com.
Qingdao University · CNUnimed Medical Institute · CNHebei Medical University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

Jinan Science and Technology Bureau 201907073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of this study is to disclose the clinically significant genomic alterations in the Chinese and Western patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

methodsA total of 86 Chinese patients were enrolled in this study. A panel of 579 pan-cancer genes was sequenced for the qualified samples from these patients. Driver genes, actionability, and tumor mutational burden were inferred and compared to a cohort of Western patients.

resultsTotally, 36 and 12 driver genes were identified in the Chinese and Western cohorts, respectively. Of them, seven driver genes (IDH1, KRAS, TP53, BAP1, PBRM1, ARID1A, and NRAS) were shared by the two cohorts. Four driver genes (SPTA1, ARID2, TP53, and GATA1) were found significantly correlated with the tumor mutational burden. For both cohorts, half of the patients had actionable mutations. The two cohorts shared the most actionable genes but differed much in their frequency. Though KRAS mutations were at the first and second actionable rank respectively for the Chinese and Western populations, they were still at a relatively low level of actionable evidence.

conclusionsThe study on the clinical significance of genomic alterations directs the future development of precision medicine for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treatment.

Indexed as

MutationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorChinaCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorActionabilityClinical significanceDriver geneGenomic alterationIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaPopulation

Identifiers

PMID33579226
PMCPMC7879680
OpenAlexW3128140983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.