Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579208›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Impact of rifampicin dose in bone and joint prosthetic device infections due to Staphylococcus spp: a retrospective single-center study in France.

M Tonnelier, A Bouras, C Joseph, Y El Samad, B Brunschweiler, J-L Schmit, C Mabille, J-P Lanoix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Infected closed pelvic fractures in two adults - Case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Current Clinical Challenges.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. If, When, and How to Use Rifampin in Acute Staphylococcal Periprosthetic Joint Infections, a Multicentre Observational Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M TonnelierInfectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France. mathilde.tonnelier87@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1600-5036
A BourasInfectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.
C JosephInfectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.
Y El SamadInfectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.
B BrunschweilerOrthopedic department, CHU Amiens Sud, 1 rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens, France.
J-L SchmitInfectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.
C MabillePharmacy department, CHU Amiens Sud, 1 rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens, France.
J-P LanoixInfectious diseases department, CHU Amiens Nord, 1 place Victor Pauchet, 80000, Amiens, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProsthetic joint infections (PJI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality burden worldwide. While surgical management is well defined, rifampicin (RIF) dose remains controversial. The aim of our study was to determine whether Rifampicin dose impact infection outcomes in PJI due to Staphylococcus spp.

methodssingle-center retrospective study including 411 patients with PJI due to Rifampicin-sensitive Staphylococcus spp. Rifampicine dose was categorized as follow: < 10 mg/kg/day, 10-20 mg/kg/day or > 20 mg/kg/day. The primary endpoint was patient recovery, defined as being free of infection during 12 months after the end of the initial antibiotic course.

results321 (78%) received RIF for the full antibiotic course. RIF dose didn't affect patients recovery rate with 67, 76 and 69% in the < 10, 10-20 and > 20 mg/kg/day groups, respectively (p = 0.083). In univariate analysis, recovery rate was significantly associated with gender (p = 0.012) but not to RIF dose, or Staphylococcus phenotype (aureus or coagulase-negative). In multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.01) and treatment duration (p <  0.01) were significantly associated with recovery rate.

conclusionThese data suggest that lower doses of RIF are as efficient and safe as the recommended high-dose French regimen in the treatment of PJI.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthritis, InfectiousDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProsthesis-Related InfectionsRetrospective StudiesRifampinStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifampinAdverse effectsProsthesis-related infectionsRifampicinSafetyStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID33579208
PMCPMC7881571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.