Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579206›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2021

Barriers, enablers, and opportunities for organisational follow-up of workplace violence from the perspective of emergency department nurses: a qualitative study.

Brodie Thomas, Anthony McGillion, Kristina Edvardsson, Peter O'Meara, Julia Van Vuuren, Evelien Spelten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A scoping review of risk determinants for workplace violence in emergency departments.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiology, Work-Up, and Management of Common Track and Field Injuries.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brodie ThomasLa Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, 471 Benetook Ave, Mildura, VIC, 3500, Australia. 16513718@students.latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4661-9768
Anthony McGillionSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Plenty Rd & Kingsbury Dr, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Kristina EdvardssonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Plenty Rd & Kingsbury Dr, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Peter O'MearaDepartment of Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, McMahons Road, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Julia Van VuurenLa Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, 471 Benetook Ave, Mildura, VIC, 3500, Australia.
Evelien SpeltenLa Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, 471 Benetook Ave, Mildura, VIC, 3500, Australia.

Funding

La Trobe University 2000002232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA lack of follow-up of violence incidents and assaulted staff has been associated with high levels of workplace violence. There is a paucity of literature on the barriers, enablers and opportunities for organisational follow-up of workplace violence. The aim of this study was to explore the barriers, enablers and opportunities for organisational follow-up of workplace violence from the perspective of Emergency Department nurses.

methodsThis qualitative study comprised two focus groups with Emergency Department nurses. Data were analysed thematically. COREQ guidelines were followed for the design and reporting of the study.

resultsThe barriers to follow-up in this study relate to the type of perpetrator, the initial incident response, the incident reporting process and organisational action. The enablers included hospital initiatives to manage violence and support staff wellbeing. The opportunities included strategies to improve follow-up and ideas for new follow-up strategies.

conclusionsOrganisational follow-up is important for the emotional and professional wellbeing of staff who experience workplace violence. Opportunities for follow-up include exploring different approaches to patients with mental health issues and focussing on reoffenders by providing appropriate support and consequences. Managers should advocate for efficient and standardised reporting processes and ensure assaulted staff have a clear perception of follow-up and are included in the follow-up process. Including the perpetrators in the follow-up process may reduce workplace violence.

Indexed as

NursesNursing Staff, HospitalWorkplace ViolenceEmergency Service, HospitalFollow-Up StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesEmergency service, hospitalNurse administratorsNurse managersOrganizational objectivesRisk managementWorkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID33579206
PMCPMC7880205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.