Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579201›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

High-pressure processing-induced transcriptome response during recovery of Listeria monocytogenes.

Ilhan Cem Duru, Florentina Ionela Bucur, Margarita Andreevskaya, Bahareh Nikparvar, Anne Ylinen, Leontina Grigore-Gurgu, Tone Mari Rode, Peter Crauwels, Pia Laine, Lars Paulin and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigating the role of theFEMS microbes · 2025
    Article
  7. High-Pressure Processing Influences Antibiotic Resistance Gene Transfer inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Impact of High-Pressure Processing (HPP) onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Acid adaptation increased the resistance ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ilhan Cem Duru *Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. ilhan.duru@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3409-5215
Florentina Ionela Bucur *Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Galati, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0488-8524
Margarita Andreevskaya *Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-3861
Bahareh NikparvarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-6573
Anne YlinenInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-7789
Leontina Grigore-GurguFaculty of Food Science and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Galati, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3746-7029
Tone Mari RodeDepartment of Process Technology, Nofima - Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8695-2920
Peter CrauwelsInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Ulm, University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081, Ulm, Germany.
Pia LaineInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3727-8749
Lars PaulinInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0923-1254
Trond LøvdalDepartment of Process Technology, Nofima - Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9155-5698
Christian U RiedelInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Ulm, University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7134-7085
Nadav BarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Daniela Borda *Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Galati, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5354-0196
Anca Ioana Nicolau *Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Galati, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8018-1478
Petri Auvinen *Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3947-4778

Funding

Academy of Finland 307856Academy of Finland 311717ERA-IB2 ERA-IB-16- 247 014Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding International and European Cooperation-250 Subprogramme 3.2-Horizon 2020-ContractNo. 15/2017Research Council of Norway 263499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-pressure processing (HPP) is a commonly used technique in the food industry to inactivate pathogens, including L. monocytogenes. It has been shown that L. monocytogenes is able to recover from HPP injuries and can start to grow again during long-term cold storage. To date, the gene expression profiling of L. monocytogenes during HPP damage recovery at cooling temperature has not been studied. In order identify key genes that play a role in recovery of the damage caused by HPP treatment, we performed RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) for two L. monocytogenes strains (barotolerant RO15 and barosensitive ScottA) at nine selected time points (up to 48 h) after treatment with two pressure levels (200 and 400 MPa).

resultsThe results showed that a general stress response was activated by SigB after HPP treatment. In addition, the phosphotransferase system (PTS; mostly fructose-, mannose-, galactitol-, cellobiose-, and ascorbate-specific PTS systems), protein folding, and cobalamin biosynthesis were the most upregulated genes during HPP damage recovery. We observed that cell-division-related genes (divIC, dicIVA, ftsE, and ftsX) were downregulated. By contrast, peptidoglycan-synthesis genes (murG, murC, and pbp2A) were upregulated. This indicates that cell-wall repair occurs as a part of HPP damage recovery. We also observed that prophage genes, including anti-CRISPR genes, were induced by HPP. Interestingly, a large amount of RNA-seq data (up to 85%) was mapped to Rli47, which is a non-coding RNA that is upregulated after HPP. Thus, we predicted that Rli47 plays a role in HPP damage recovery in L. monocytogenes. Moreover, gene-deletion experiments showed that amongst peptidoglycan biosynthesis genes, pbp2A mutants are more sensitive to HPP.

conclusionsWe identified several genes and mechanisms that may play a role in recovery from HPP damage of L. monocytogenes. Our study contributes to new information on pathogen inactivation by HPP.

Indexed as

Listeria monocytogenesFood MicrobiologyFood-Processing IndustryTemperatureTranscriptomeFood pathogenRli47Sigma factor BStress recoveryTime-series RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID33579201
PMCPMC7881616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.