Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33579043›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Challenges to the Fight against Rabies-The Landscape of Policy and Prevention Strategies in Africa.

Andrea Haekyung Haselbeck, Sylvie Rietmann, Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse, Kerstin Kling, Maria Elena Kaschubat-Dieudonné, Florian Marks, Wibke Wetzker, Christa Thöne-Reineke

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrea Haekyung HaselbeckInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1740-0011
Sylvie RietmannInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Birkneh Tilahun TadesseInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4005-8605
Kerstin KlingImmunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0223-0814
Maria Elena Kaschubat-DieudonnéInstitute of Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science, Center for Veterinary Public Health, Freie University Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.
Florian MarksInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Wibke WetzkerClinic for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1474-6930
Christa Thöne-ReinekeInstitute of Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science, Center for Veterinary Public Health, Freie University Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0782-2755
International Vaccine Institute · KRJena University Hospital · DERobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly 59,000 human deaths worldwide are attributable to rabies annually, of which more than a third occur in Africa. In recent years, progress has been made in both action and collaboration including implementation of surveillance and prevention measures. In this review we assess the scale of surveillance, preventive, and control efforts of canine-transmitted human rabies in African countries. We reviewed literature published from 2014 to 2018, retrieved from electronic databases including MEDLINE, Global Index Medicus, BIOSIS, Science Citation Index, and EMBASE. WHO reports, national disease control program reports, and conference proceedings were also reviewed. The database search was conducted using keywords including rabies, control, and prevention. In forty countries (40/54), some level of rabies control and prevention strategy was available while in fourteen (14/54) countries, no specific national control and prevention strategy for human rabies could be retrieved. Thirty-four (34/54) countries utilized the Stepwise Approach towards Rabies Elimination (SARE) tool to monitor the national rabies control efforts-five of these countries were at the lowest tier (0/5) of the SARE scoring system while no country had achieved the highest score (5/5). High burden countries need to step up the implementation of context specific national rabies control, prevention, and monitoring strategies. As a zoonosis, rabies control and elimination require coordination between human and veterinarian health sectors under the "One Health" umbrella and with national master plans on the prevention and control of neglected tropical diseases ending in 2020, the time to act is now.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesRabiesRabies VaccinesAfricaAnimalsDisease EradicationDogsHumansPolicyRabies VaccinesAfricapreventionrabieszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID33579043
PMCPMC7916782
OpenAlexW3127277124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.